12 June – Issues of Interest
Nigel Latta on National Standards
On Facebook, child psychologist and TV host, Nigel Latta, had this to say about the recent National Standards “results”;
The latest national standards ‘results’ being reported in the media are utter nonsense. Pure and simple. Even if we ignore the large inconsistencies between the way that the ‘standards’ are measured (and we can’t because the inconsistencies make comparisons all but impossible), and the fact that it assumes all children of a given age are maturing at the same rate (which they don’t), and we ignore the impact of little things like child poverty (which some politicians like to do much to their shame), it’s still impossible to say anything at all about a change in the numbers when you only have two data points.
They can’t say that a difference of 1.2-2% on the various measures between last year and this year is an ‘improvement’, because we simply don’t know.
If you had assessed all of those very same children again the day after they were assessed for these numbers, in the exact same conditions with the exact same measures, then you would also get a different number. That’s because in the real world we have this little thing called statistical variation–things never work out exactly the same. To make any meaningful statements about ‘improvements’ you need meaningful measures (which national standards aren’t anyway) over several different data points (i.e. over several years).
I wish the media would get that very simple, but very important point. Politicians will spin it as a gain, but it isn’t. It’s simply meaningless statistical ‘noise’.
The government went with national standards because they thought voters would like it, not because it’s the best thing for making progress on education. If we really wanted to lift our ‘national standards’ then, perhaps as a beginning, we’d take more care of the large numbers of our kids living in poverty.
When they produce their ‘rankings’ of schools I’m pretty sure it’s going to show a trend whereby higher decile schools meet/exceed the ‘standards’ much more than lower decile schools. I wonder why that might be? And who do we blame for that? Teachers?
Don’t be sucked in by all this political positioning. My advice is to ignore the national standards tables because they don’t mean anything. There’s a reason teachers were so opposed to the way these ‘national standards’ are being used… fundamentally because it’s nonsense!
100% Pure brand busted!
New Zealand’s distance from it’s major trading partners (except Australia) has always been a major impediment to our trading. Our point-of-difference has been the quality of our food products, and has made them desirable commodities on that basis. Branding ourselves as “100% Pure” and “Clean and Green” were marketing tools that created a multi-billion dollar export industry.
But that is coming to an end.
We are not “100% Pure” and nor are we “Clean and Green”. Anything but.
National has paid lip service to being green.
Pollution has been allowed to increase.
It’s focus on “reforming” the RMA to allow for exploitation mof sensitive environmental areas; more and more chemicals ion our farms; allowing dangerous deep sea drilling of our coastline; mining in Conservation lands; and ditching our committment to the Kyoto Protocol – have not gone unnoticed by our trading partners.
And those trading partners are starting to react accordingly,
Acknowledgment: Radio NZ – Sri Lanka demands DCD testing on NZ milk powder
Not when National has appointed a board to over-see a resource consent application to allow an increase of nitrogen pollution in the Tukituki River by a staggering 250% !
Acknowledgment: Radio NZ – Nitrate proposal seen as death knell for river
This will not doubt be ratchetted back to “only” 50% or 100%, and National will claim that they are “listening” to public concerns. It’s an old political trick when a deeply unpopular policy is put forward. Make a number unfeasibly large; then offer a lower number, and claim that government has listened to the public. In reality it was the lower number all along that was the preferred option.
National has consistently undermined environmental protections in this country, as well as knee-capped DoC by sacking staff and under-funding it’s operations.
We are now starting to pay the price of right-wing policies that pursue business and profit ahead of preserving our environment.
What National and it’s one-eyed supporters don’t seem to comprehend is that business and profits are dependendent on our clean and green environment. Mess up the environment and expect to lose customers and profits.
Just ask the Sri Lankans.
For those neo-liberals and naive National supporters who advocate replacing our socialised healthcare system with privatised healthcare insurance, I present the reality,
Acknowledgment: NZ Herald – NZ private health insurance uptake hits 6-yr low
Private health-privider, Wakefield chairman Alan Isaac said,
“The total number of New Zealanders with private health insurance (is) decreasing.”
Well, no wonder!
Even as private healthcare companies like Wakefield are complaining about losing customers, they are hiking premiums and still making a 27% increase in full-year earnings. Twentyseven percent! Compare that to other investments, and you begin to realise that these companies aren’t doing too bad.
That’s 27% that could have been re-invested in healthcare – but is instead going into the pockets of shareholders.
What would happen, I wonder, if New Zealand’s healthcare system was fully privatised and went totally “free market”, as ACT policy demands?
This OECD chart suggests the result, if we were ever foolish enough to go down that road,
At 7,290, the United States spends nearly three times as much on healthcare as we do. Their private/public health costs are vastly greater than the entire public/private expenditure we have here in New Zealand with our “socialised” system.
And ACT wants to emulate our American cuzzies?!
The only thing the USA has demonstrated is that a privatised healthcare system will result in a massive blow-out in costs and rapacious profits for shareholders.
The argument from the neo-liberal Right is that private enterprise is “more efficient” and better for consumers. This is absolute bollocks.
If anything, private health insurance is highly ineffective at delivering universal healthcare for it’s clients,
Acknowledgment: Fairfax Media – Ongoing jumps in health insurance costs
As has been observed by others in the past, private health insurance is relatively cheap when you are young, healthy, and make few demands for medical intervention.
But with old age; increased infirmity; and heightened vulnerabilty comes increased premium payments for policy-holders. Just when they most require increased medical services.
This is the fatal flaw in private medical insurance; those who most require it, will pay the highest premiums. And pay, and pay, and pay…
Just ask the Americans.
Other blogs: Canadian and U.S. healthcare – a debate
Some good news at last…
It has been a stain on our reputation that despite our anti-nuclear legislation, our Superannuation Fund was still investing in overseas companies engaged in producing atomic bombs and cluster munitions. This was a problem (I refuse to call it an “issue”) that I highlighted in December, last year.
Previous related blogposts: New Zealand’s OTHER secret shame
Previous related blogposts: New Zealand’s OTHER secret shame – *Update*
The Superannuation Fund has done the right thing by no longer continuing to invest in Babcock & Wilcox, Fluor Corporation, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Jacobs Engineering Group, Serco Group and URS Corporation;
Acknowledgment: Fairfax Media – Super Fund sells nuclear investments
The other weapons we are no longer investing in is the manufacture of cluster-munitions. These vile things are the weapons-of-choice for vicious dictators and other repressive regimes which they use against their civilian population.
They have been used in Syria, against unarmed civilians. Children have been killed by these monstrous devices. (see: Syrian children ‘killed by cluster bombs’)
Cluster munitions have been outlawed by nearly 100 nations which signed a treaty to ban cluster bombs. In 2009, to their credit, the current National-led government passed legislation banning these obscene weapons from our country. This included the possession, retaining, stockpiling, assistance, encouragement, or even inducement to deal with them.
NZ Parliament: Cluster Munitions Prohibition Act 2009 (17 Dec 2009)
It would take a ruthless person to discount this human suffering and advocate for our continued investment in their manufacture.
The Superannuation Fund was effectively breaking the law with it’s investments in General Dynamics, L-3 Communications, Raytheon, and the Goodrich Corp.
It’s good to see that our fingers are no longer bloodied by such investments.
As for right-wingers who dismiss investment in atomic bombs or cluster munition – go play with a cluster bomb. Come back to me after it’s detonated in your hands. Then we’ll talk.
Just ask the Syrians.
The bucks stops
with me over there, somewhere…
I guess it was inevitable, really…
Acknowledgment: Radio NZ – Deputy Secretary resigns over Novopay
Did we really, really expect any one of the three Ministers who signed off on Novopay to put their hand up and admit responsibility?!
No less than three ministers signed off on Novopay, to allow it to “go live”;
- Education Minisrer Hekia Parata
- Associate Education Minister Craig Foss
- Finance Minister Bill English
Because doesn’t it strike people as indicative that Minister for Everything, aka, Mr Fixit, Steven Joyce was appointed Minister in charge of Novopay – thereby taking responsibility for this ongoing balls-up away from Parata?! (see: ODT – Joyce to take on handling of Novopay)
Despite the so-call “ministerial inquiry”, Joyce had a very interesting point to make on 31 January;
“Steven Joyce revealed that Education Minister Hekia Parata, Finance Minister Bill English and former education minister Craig Foss approved the use of Novopay despite being told that it had bugs.”
So… how can Joyce’s statement be reconciled with his statement, five months later,
“Reporting to Ministers was inconsistent, unduly optimistic and sometimes misrepresented the situation.”
Source: Beehive.govt.nz: Ministerial Inquiry report into Novopay released
Either Ministers were “told that it had bugs” or reporting was “unduly optimistic and sometimes misrepresented the situation“. Which is it?!
By the way, the Ministerial Inquiry was undertaken by Maarten Wevers and Chairman of Deloitte New Zealand Murray Jack.
Mr Weavers was former head of the Department of the Prime Minister (John Key) and Cabinet.
Connect the dots.
Other blogposts: Gordon Campbell on the latest Novopay revelations
= fs =