Can we afford to have “a chat on food in schools”?
.
.
1. We’ve had the ‘chat’
We should all know the facts and stats by now;
In 2006/07 230,000, or 22 percent, of New Zealand children were still living in poverty. That is, in households with incomes below the 60 percent median income poverty line, after taking housing costs into account. This is more than the entire population of North Shore City (205,605) or the Manawatu-Wanganui region (222,423) and means one adult and one child were living on $430 a week before housing costs. (see: Brief Statistics on Child Poverty in New Zealand 2004-2008)
By 2011/12, approximately 270,000, or 25%, of New Zealand children were living in poverty. (see: Solutions to Child Poverty)
A recent UNICEF report placed New Zealand amongst the worst in developed countries for child wellbeing, ranking us 25th out of 34 developed countries. We are now behind Australia and Britain also for homicide rates, child health, and safety. (See: NZ ranked poorly on child welfare)
The same UNICEF report rated our country third for clean air and fourth for children’s education outcomes in reading, maths, science and literacy. I’m sure clean air and high achievements in readin’, writin’, ‘n ‘rithmetic, will mean a lot to young chldren going to school with empty bellies… (Note sarcasm.)
In 2011, Dennis McKinlay, executive director at Unicef New Zealand, said,
“New Zealand currently spends US$14,600 ($17,500) per child whilst, in comparison, Scandinavian countries spend US$50,000 per child under six. Other countries, like the Netherlands, spend less but have better outcomes. The stark reality is that poor outcomes for children are costing New Zealand $6 billion per year in areas such as health, welfare services, crime and justice.”
Acknowledgement: NZ Herald – Study: Quarter of NZ kids in poverty
McKinlay was 100% on the mark when he said spending on children should not be considered as a social cost but as an economic investment for the future of the country.
We have lost our moral compass when we demand tax cuts ahead of good policies that benefit our children.
The situation is so dire for many families that their households are often empty of food. After rent, power, and other fixed costs are taken out of their meagre incomes, there is simply not much left for discretionary spending on things like food, medication, clothing, etc.
As a blogger, “Burnt out Teacher” (Amanda Kennedy), recently wrote on The Daily Blog,
“You have $440 dollars after tax from your minimum wage job. $290 of it goes on your rent. You have $150 left. You pay $198 towards your power bill. Your car needs registering at a cost of $290.97. You owe Watercare $58.20 for last month. You need at least $15 of petrol to get to the doctor and back (the doctor will cost another $20 per child) because your children have asthma and your house is damp and cold. Both kids need new shoes for winter. Your boyfriend just beat you up. You are crying. How much debt are you in, and what are your kids going to eat today? ”
Acknowledgement: The Daily Blog – Hungry Kids Annoy Frazzled Lobby Group Director
To those who care enough, I encourage you to read “Burnt out Teacher’s” full blogpost. It makes for sobering reading.
2. More ‘chat’?
On 7 May, Children’s Commissioner, Dr Russell Wills, wrote an op-ed piece for the Dominion Post;
.
Acknowledgement: The Dominion Post – Time for a chat on food in schools
.
As Dr Wills said,
“ We need solutions that recognise the many complex causes of child hunger and poverty if we are to use the limited resources we have to make a real difference to children’s education and health outcomes.
Blaming parents is unhelpful and simplistic.”
So far, so good.
However, in the next sentence from Dr Wills gave cause for concern,
“ I am not a fan of overseas models of fully state-funded school cafeterias. They tend to provide poor food, assume state responsibility for a parent’s role, create dependence, cost a lot of money that could be better spent elsewhere, take up school management time, and provide no role for parents, business or community organisations.”
Dr Wills may or may not realise that by issuing the statement that “fully state-funded school cafeterias… tend to provide poor food, assume state responsibility for a parent’s role, create dependence…” – he is perpetuating several unhealthy prejudices which the politically rightwing and conservative religious groups use to oppose food in schools for children.
Namely the extremist neo-conservative group, the so-called “Family First”, which also stated,
“ It also creates a dependence on a service which may not always be able to be provided…
[…]
It also creates a dependence on a service which may not always be able to be provided.”
Acknowledgement: “Family First’: Food In Schools Will Feed The Problem
Hopefully it is a mere coincidence that Dr Wills’ comments seem to mirror the extremist views of “Family First”.
Where Dr Wills’ op-ed piece falls down is his proposals for how to provide food in schools. Dr Wills proposed that schools be responsible for growing their own food, and to operate in partnerships with businesses. He promoted philanthropy rather than state intervention.
I asked for feedback from the principals of two low decile schools, and from Bryan Bruce, documentary-maker, child poverty campaigner, and producer of the documentary, “Inside Child Poverty“, on Dr Wills’ proposals.
I first asked all three; having read Dr Wills’ op-ed piece, “Time for a chat on food in schools”, what was their overall view on the points he had made?
“The points he makes are quite valid. I think he is right that we do need a different approach to the way cafeteria type models run overseas. NZ general has its main meal in the evening – however in saying that these children often only eat what they are given at school and don’t eat much in the evening. To form a group to look into the best way to supply food is a good idea.”
“ Overall, his comments are generally valid and his suggested solutions have merit – but only if you regard the solutions as short-term solutions. The real solution to child poverty is for structural changes to NZ society and changed government policies, particularly ensuring a decent living income for all. With this approach, all families would be able to afford the food, afford the time to put into their kids (not working 2 jobs, or working early morning shifts, etc). Education for parents to help with budgeting, cooking, etc would also fill a gap. Without this approach, the proposed solutions rely on businesses, charities, and schools.”
“ I am not a fan of overseas models of fully state-funded school cafeterias. They tend to provide poor food, assume state responsibility for a parent’s role, create dependence, cost a lot of money that could be better spent elsewhere, take up school management time, and provide no role for parents, business or community organisations.”
“ I think he is right. We need to look for a nutritious alternative that does not take school time – we are there to provide education not food. The food needs to be provided by an independent source that is reliable.”
“ I worked in UK schools for 4 years from 1999-2002, and saw the ‘school dinners’ (lunches) programme in operation. I don’t know about the cost to the authorities, but I don’t think it took up much school management time. The food quality was variable, but this is easily changed with the right will, as showed by Jamie Oliver’s crusade to make school dinners healthy.”
“ You can find good and bad examples of state funded cafeterias. So we know how bad it could be – let’s regulate the process from the start and model ourselves on the best ones – like the one I visited in Sweden . It is in a migrant area and the food was nutritious, tasty and much enjoyed by the kids .”
My next point; Dr Wills suggested that, “in some schools parents and whanau are encouraged to help garden, harvest veges, cook and serve the food. This teaches gardening and cooking skills, and helps build relationships between parents, whanau and teachers”
“This is a glorious hope – but it wont work in the long term. Yes it is great to grow veges and encourage parents to be involved but this won’t supply the lunches everyday. The parents are not reliable enough to turn up everyday and make lunch – for it to work properly it needs to be a commercial venture. Schools have to have a fully guaranteed liunch programme everyday that they don’t need to worry about.”
“Great if it works. Problems include vandalism to gardens, and difficulty to have parents regularly available. Yes it may help with relationships but not necessarily – relationship are better built over students’ education.”
“While I think its a very good idea to teach kids how to grow food, but the idea of sustaining a school food programme on a grow your own basis would take up most of the playing fields and leave the kids with little time for anything else .”
I then asked, is this practical practical in the short term? Long term? Would gardening, harvesting veges, cooking and serving the food be more time consuming than the provision of fully state-funded school meals? Where would vegetables be cooked?
“I have no idea where the food would be cooked on a large scale. You have to employ people who have the skills to provide food on a large scale everyday. We would have nowhere at present that you could cook or eat on a large scale.”
“I believe it would be [more time consuming than the provision of fully state-funded school meals].
With the UK school dinners, the schools have commercial kitchens. This school [Taita Central School] certain doesn’t have the necessary kitchen facilities.”
“Food is a fundamental health need. Let’s put in the Swedish model – full time caterers and school restaurants. This will create jobs, ( for chefs, cooks, builders) which will stimulate our economy, reduce our health spend on crisis care for obese, diabetic and future adults with dodgy hearts.”
Dr Wills further claimed that, “teachers involve students in the growing, harvesting and preparation of the food, so the programme is linked to learning goals. In many cases NGOs partner schools and businesses to provide the programme.”
Is a Public Private Partnership a desirable proposal? Or reliance on a a current ideological fad?
Does reliance on “teachers involve students in the growing, harvesting and preparation of the food” take students away from an already packed curriculum and place more demands on teachers and other staff?
“Teachers do not have time to do this on the scale that is needed to feed the whole school. Being out in the sunshine gardening is lovely – but what about winter!!! We won’t get to National Standards in Reading, Writing, and Maths if we are out gardening all day. To have small class gardens that we have where children grow vegetables and take them home is great and teaches the skills of growing food but this won’t work on an everyday basis to feed everyone.”
To Dr Wills suggestion that “teachers involve students in the growing, harvesting and preparation of the food, so the programme is linked to learning goals. In many cases NGOs partner schools and businesses to provide the programme” – Mike Fackney responded,
“This is fine, but not something which can really continue on an on-going basis, particularly with all the other expectations the government has on schools.”
And when asked “Is a Public Private Partnership a desirable proposal? Or reliance on a a current ideological fad?” – he replied,
“It’s never really a desirable proposal for schools to rely on private support.”
Bryan Bruce was even less enthusiastic at Dr Wills’ proposals,
“We seem to be going back to the 19th Century idea of relying on charities and volunteers to look after the poor. Haven’t we learned anything ?
In my view it’s like this – teachers are not hired to be caterers. They are doing it out of compassion. Are we now asking them to be full time gardeners as well.”
Dr Wills also said ; “In many cases NGOs partner schools and businesses to provide the programme… It gives businesses an opportunity to give back to their communities, the cost to the taxpayer is reduced and the food is nutritious. Notice that these models leave responsibility for running and funding programmes with communities.”
He also states,
” However, I think there could be two potential roles for government funding. First, there is a place for a co-ordination role to bring together schools and businesses, and manage the programme and the workload for principals and business owners.
Second, there is an argument to match government funding to philanthropy on a sliding scale.
For example, $3 for every $1 raised in a decile 1 school, decreasing for better-off schools.
Matched funding like this encourages communities to build and own their own solutions, and incentivises businesses to give to their communities rather than replacing philanthropy with taxpayer funding, which has the opposite effect. Funding could be made available only to programmes that adhere to agreed standards, raising the quality of programmes. None of this requires legislative change.”
Dr Wills appears to be promoting a State/Philantropy Partnership policy. Is this a practical means by which to promote food in schools, or is it an abrogation of duties which should be the State’s responsibility on this issue?
What happens where businesses or private philantropy is not forthcoming – especially in poorer areas with high unemployment and few businesses? And would private businesses expect a quid pro quo, ie, advertising on school grounds?
.
Photograph: Upper Hutt School, Upper Hutt
.
“This again puts pressure on schools to spend time on activities other than teaching children!! There is no money in the community. $10 is alot of money in Cannons Creek. We do not charge more that $2 or $3 for a school trip and subsidise the rest with school money. We have no school fees and provide such things as sunhats, beanies, shoes, socks, etc ourselves. I think there needs to be further investigation into how poor is poor. It may only be small groups of decile 1 schools that need this support.”
To Dr Wills’s comment that “in many cases NGOs partner schools and businesses to provide the programme… It gives businesses an opportunity to give back to their communities, the cost to the taxpayer is reduced and the food is nutritious. Notice that these models leave responsibility for running and funding programmes with communities.”
Mike replies,
“A far easier way is that it’s organised through the taxation system (i.e. a fairer taxation system) and provided by government – as schools are.”
As for the rest of Dr Wills’ comments above, Mike says,
“All of this sounds like an organisation nightmare.”
“If we want to rebuild a fair an equitable society where every child gets a fair go you can’t have kids in poor schools gardening to grow their dinner while kids in rich schools get their lunch provided and spend their school time doing maths and reading. If the public school system does not treat every child equally (and it already isn’t) then watch the gap between the rich and the poor get bigger and bigger.”
Dr Wills also suggests that , “ … we need a small project to bring together schools, NGOs, officials and experts to reach a consensus on what food in schools done well looks like. From there we could develop guidelines and standards for food in schools programmes. ”
Is this a viable, necessary step? Or a case of “talking heads around a table” whilst the problem of hungry children goes unaddressed?
“This sounds like a great idea – count me in. If this is going to be addressed properly and a long term healthy solution found then it needs a focused approach. With the right people and funding it could move quite quickly.”
When I asked, can we afford Dr Wills’ suggestion “Maybe it’s time for a cup of tea on food in schools?“, Bryan Bruce was less than impressed,
“ Forget the cup of tea and the charity and poor kids being constant gardeners – let’s get on and feed our kids properly so the teachers are freed to do their job and our kids can learn the 21 st Century skills they will need to earn money, pay their taxes and grow our economy.”
Ruth also offered her thoughts on matters arising from Dr Wills’ ideas.
Questons such as; who cares and tends to the gardens during school holidays? Are school staff expected to tend to garden plots during holidays?
Ruth O’Neill
“I can tell you that the class gardens all go to seed over the xmas break and then it takes all of term 1 when the soil is rock hard to get them up and running again. Then in the winter they are like a bog!!! On any given weekend people will come into the grounds and trash them, throw alcohol and broken glass bottles in them. Urinate in them – would you want your child doing the gardening?? Or people steal the veges.”
What about schools that have little or no spare land for gardens?
“Exactly??? Or who have high vandalism.”
I then asked how much food can be grown to sustain anywhere from thirty to a few hundred school children in any given school? The respone from Ruth was fairly predictable,
“ You could not grow enough food to maintain the whole programme. It is also a question of having the right veges on the right day to make the soup or the sandwiches. You need lettuces and tomatoes everyday!!”
And of course the also-obvious question which I put to Ruth – what do children eat whilst crops are growing?
“Exactly – totally impractical unless it is on a massive commercial scale for a big group of schools and the funding to buy in produce when needed to supplement supplies.”
And is a “chat” really necessary – or is it time to Just Do It; to get on with feeding our children and leave the “conversation” to some other time? (It’s easy for middle class professionals to want to engage in public debate. Especially on a full belly.)
Ruth O’Neill
“It needs addressing and in a timely manner – the chat would need to lead to actions and funding.”
“All of the above are very valid concerns.”
This blogger concurs with Bryan, Ruth, and Mike; Dr Wills has suggested some positive ideas – but the prospect of turning our schools into vast agricultural plots to feed hungry child is simply not practical.
Children go to school, first and foremost, to learn.
Those children from low-income or impoverished families should not be made to become mini-farmers.
Teachers go to school, first and foremost, to teach.
They do not expect to add Farm Manager to their C.V.
Child poverty is here, in our country. Whilst right wing conservatives ‘tut-tut’ and wag their judgemental fingers at the problem (I refuse point-blank to call it an “issue”), children through no fault of their own are going hungry and their learning experience is diminished.
As a nation, it is almost as if we have embarked on a deliberate course of increasing poverty and ensuring the advent of the next generation of impoverished New Zealanders.
If that is our aim, then we are exceeding all expectations. The UNICEF report referred to above proves that poverty is a growth industry in this country.
The time for “chat” is over.
3. “Feed The Kids” Bill in Parliament – Chat with MPs
The Mana Party in Parliament has a Bill before the House. The bill is designed to fund nutritional breakfasts and lunches to all their students in decile 1 and 2 schools.
For more info, see: Feed the Kids Bill
As their website points out,
- Feeding the kids should be our first priority as a nation.
- The Bill aims to set up government funded breakfast and lunch programmes in all decile 1-2 schools.
- It’s a simple, easy and immediate way to address growing levels of child poverty in Aotearoa and has been a key recommendation of leading organisations such as the Children’s Commissioner’s Expert Advisory Group on Solutions to Child Poverty.
- The Bill is expected to come before Parliament for its first reading on Wednesday 5 June. So far Labour, Greens, Maori Party, NZ First, and Independent MP Brendan Horan have agreed to support it.
- We need one more vote to get it passed and to a select committee for further consideration.
One more vote.
That’s all it will take.
Accordingly, Documentary-maker and child poverty campaigner, Bryan Bruce, is encouraging people to write to all MPs, asking that they vote for the Bill. As Bryan wrote on his Facebook Page,
You’re 7 years old. It’s winter. You haven’t had breakfast and you’re hungry. What do you want to hear?
“Why doesn’t your Mum feed you in the morning? I hope you’re not going to grow up to be a bad parent like her?”
OR
“Hey! Here’s some Milo. There’s toast over there and weetbix , milk and fruit on the table. Help yourself.”
We can’t change tomorrow if we don’t do the right thing today.
Please contact your local MP and ask them to support the Feed The Kids Bill. You will find their email addresses here:
Bryan even suggests a pre-formatted letter to send,
Dear [or Kia ora] (name of MP)
My name is…………. I live in your electorate . I urge you to commit to cross- party talks on how to end Child Poverty in New Zealand.
Please begin by agreeing to Cross-Party discussions on how we can implement a policy of supplying healthy meals in schools and show good faith by supporting the Feed The Kids Bill as a first step.
Yours faithfully………
Even something as simple as,
Dear [or Kia ora] (name of MP)
Please support the Feed the Kids Bill. Nothing is as important as ensuring that all children have a decent chance in life.
Yours faithfully………
Or,
Dear [or Kia ora] (name of MP)
Please support the Feed the Kids Bill. This is so important to me that I’ll be basing my vote at the next election for those candidates/parties who support this Bill.
Yours faithfully………
The MPs email addresses,
.
| Adams, Amy | National Party, Selwyn |
| Ardern, Jacinda | Labour Party, List |
| Ardern, Shane | National Party, Taranaki-King Country |
| Auchinvole, Chris | National Party, List |
| Bakshi, Kanwaljit Singh | National Party, List |
| Banks, John | ACT New Zealand, Epsom |
| Barry, Maggie | National Party, North Shore |
| Beaumont, Carol | Labour Party, List |
| Bennett, David | National Party, Hamilton East |
| Bennett, Paula | National Party, Waitakere |
| Blue, Jackie | National Party, List |
| Borrows, Chester | National Party, Whanganui |
| Bridges, Simon | National Party, Tauranga |
| Browning, Steffan | Green Party, List |
| Brownlee, Gerry | National Party, Ilam |
| Calder, Cam | National Party, List |
| Carter, David | National Party, List |
| Clark, David | Labour Party, Dunedin North |
| Clendon, David | Green Party, List |
| Coleman, Jonathan | National Party, Northcote |
| Collins, Judith | National Party, Papakura |
| Cosgrove, Clayton | Labour Party, List |
| Cunliffe, David | Labour Party, New Lynn |
| Curran, Clare | Labour Party, Dunedin South |
| Dalziel, Lianne | Labour Party, Christchurch East |
| Dean, Jacqui | National Party, Waitaki |
| Delahunty, Catherine | Green Party, List |
| Dunne, Peter | United Future, Ohariu |
| Dyson, Ruth | Labour Party, Port Hills |
| English, Bill | National Party, Clutha-Southland |
| Faafoi, Kris | Labour Party, Mana |
| Fenton, Darien | Labour Party, List |
| Finlayson, Christopher | National Party, List |
| Flavell, Te Ururoa | Maori Party, Waiariki |
| Foss, Craig | National Party, Tukituki |
| Genter, Julie Anne | Green Party, List |
| Gilmore, Aaron | National Party, List |
| Goff, Phil | Labour Party, Mt Roskill |
| Goldsmith, Paul | National Party, List |
| Goodhew, Jo | National Party, Rangitata |
| Graham, Kennedy | Green Party, List |
| Groser, Tim | National Party, List |
| Guy, Nathan | National Party, Otaki |
| Hague, Kevin | Green Party, List |
| Harawira, Hone | Mana, Te Tai Tokerau |
| Hayes, John | National Party, Wairarapa |
| Heatley, Phil | National Party, Whangarei |
| Henare, Tau | National Party, List |
| Hipkins, Chris | Labour Party, Rimutaka |
| Horan, Brendan | Independent, List |
| Hughes, Gareth | Green Party, List |
| Huo, Raymond | Labour Party, List |
| Hutchison, Paul | National Party, Hunua |
| Jones, Shane | Labour Party, List |
| Joyce, Steven | National Party, List |
| Kaye, Nikki | National Party, Auckland Central |
| Key, John | National Party, Helensville |
| King, Annette | Labour Party, Rongotai |
| King, Colin | National Party, Kaikoura |
| Lee, Melissa | National Party, List |
| Lees-Galloway, Iain | Labour Party, Palmerston North |
| Little, Andrew | Labour Party, List |
| Logie, Jan | Green Party, List |
| Lole-Taylor, Asenati | NZ First, List |
| Lotu-Iiga, Peseta Sam | National Party, Maungakiekie |
| Macindoe, Tim | National Party, Hamilton West |
| Mackey, Moana | Labour Party, List |
| Mahuta, Nanaia | Labour Party, Hauraki-Waikato |
| Mallard, Trevor | Labour Party, Hutt South |
| Martin, Tracey | NZ First, List |
| Mathers, Mojo | Green Party, List |
| McClay, Todd | National Party, Rotorua |
| McCully, Murray | National Party, East Coast Bays |
| McKelvie, Ian | National Party, Rangitikei |
| Mitchell, Mark | National Party, Rodney |
| Moroney, Sue | Labour Party, List |
| Ngaro, Alfred | National Party, List |
| Norman, Russel | Green Party, List |
| O’Connor, Damien | Labour Party, West Coast-Tasman |
| O’Connor, Simon | National Party, Tamaki |
| O’Rourke, Denis | NZ First, List |
| Parata, Hekia | National Party, List |
| Parker, David | Labour Party, List |
| Peters, Winston | NZ First, List |
| Prasad, Rajen | Labour Party, List |
| Prosser, Richard | NZ First, List |
| Robertson, Grant | Labour Party, Wellington Central |
| Robertson, Ross | Labour Party, Manukau East |
| Roche, Denise | Green Party, List |
| Ross, Jami-Lee | National Party, Botany |
| Roy, Eric | National Party, Invercargill |
| Ryall, Tony | National Party, Bay of Plenty |
| Sabin, Mike | National Party, Northland |
| Sage, Eugenie | Green Party, List |
| Shanks, Katrina | National Party, List |
| Sharples, Pita | Maori Party, Tamaki Makaurau |
| Shearer, David | Labour Party, Mt Albert |
| Simpson, Scott | National Party, Coromandel |
| Sio, Su’a William | Labour Party, Mangere |
| Smith, Nick | National Party, Nelson |
| Stewart, Barbara | NZ First, List |
| Street, Maryan | Labour Party, List |
| Tirikatene, Rino | Labour Party, Te Tai Tonga |
| Tisch, Lindsay | National Party, Waikato |
| Tolley, Anne | National Party, East Coast |
| Tremain, Chris | National Party, Napier |
| Turei, Metiria | Green Party, List |
| Turia, Tariana | Maori Party, Te Tai Hauauru |
| Twyford, Phil | Labour Party, Te Atatu |
| Upston, Louise | National Party, Taupo |
| Wagner, Nicky | National Party, Christchurch Central |
| Walker, Holly | Green Party, List |
| Wall, Louisa | Labour Party, Manurewa |
| Wilkinson, Kate | National Party, Waimakariri |
| Williams, Andrew | NZ First, List |
| Williamson, Maurice | National Party, Pakuranga |
| Woodhouse, Michael | National Party, List |
| Woods, Megan | Labour Party, Wigram |
| Yang, Jian | National Party, List |
| Young, Jonathan | National Party, New Plymouth |
.
I leave the final word to Bryan, from his Facebook page,
OK, let’s get some things straight about providing free healthy meals in schools.
1. First of all let’s decide on the principle before arguing about the detail.
Let’s admit there is a significant problem of children turning up to school hungry and that a lot of kids are eating low cost foods that contain a lot of sugar and fat , causing obesity , diabetes and long term health problems.
And at least get the Feed The Kids Bill to Parliamentary Select Committee. You can argue all you want about how it should be funded or what’s going to be on the menu there.
If you don’t think we have a community responsibility to feed children and/or educate their palates to healthy eating habits – then read no further it will only make you angry.
2. It doesn’t fill a hungry kids tummy to point at their parents and shout “Your problem is you have bad parents”. This page takes the view that kids don’t get to choose their parents and we have a community responsibility to ALL our kids to make sure they grow up healthy. And if that means feeding them for free- then that’s what we do.
3. No one is going to force feed any child food they don’t want to eat or is culturally inappropriate. If you watch the video below which I filmed in Sweden for the documentary you will see children from multi -cultural backgrounds CHOOSING their food. And Yes children with allergies are catered for and Yes children can still bring their own lunch prepared by the parents .
4.Free healthy school meals can be paid for without raising taxes. We just choose to re-distribute the existing pool of tax payer money and give up on some other things. Here are some suggestions, I’m sure you can think of other ways we could spend smarter.
(a) We could fund school meals out of the Health vote rather than the Education vote. In a document released under the Official Information Act I revealed that children under 14 receive 10% of the money set aside for health care. But children under 14 represent 20% of our population. So we could fund some of it – if not all of it – by giving kids their fair share.
(b )It is a well accepted health statistic that for every $1 we spend on preventing disease we save $4 in expensive hospital cure. So within a few years the scheme will fund itself out of what we save. If we DON’T do it, taxpayers will be spending much more than they are now on the Health budget in the future.
(c) We could make children a spending priority. National plans to spend a billion a year on Roads of National Significance over the next 10 years. What about Children? – aren’t they of National Significance? I’d much rather feed our kids than be able to by – pass small towns while driving to Auckland .
(d) We could pay the pension to people when they actually stop working and not just because they reach 65.
(e) We could spend more energy making sure people paid their taxes . Last year the IRD detected about a Billion dollars worth of tax evasion mostly by businesses. It’s estimated that the real tax evasion in NZ is between 4 and 5 Billion.
If you pay PAYE you can’t cheat your taxes. So we could easily pay for free school meals if more adults played fair.Let’s impose greater penalties for tax evasion, and let’s stop thinking of tax as a bad thing. Tax is a good thing – it’s giving to ourselves. That’s how we can have schools and hospitals and yes even Roads Of National significance. Tax is the price of civilisation. Get over it.
Now whether you agree with some of the above, all of the above or none of the above , let’s at least agree that The Feed The Kids Bill should at least go to Select Committee after its First Reading so the issue can be properly debated.
Please contact your local MP today and urge them to support the Feed The Kids Bill.
You can find their contact details here, just click on their name :
http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/MPP/MPs/MPs
Thank you,
Bryan
This blogpost was first published on The Daily Blog on 10 May 2013.
.
.
*
.
Acknowledgement
My sincerest appreciation and thanks go to Bryan Bruce, Mike Fackney, and Ruth O’Neill for taking time out of their busy schedules to respond to my questions.
Other Blog Posts
The Daily Blog: Hungry Kids Annoy Frazzled Lobby Group Director
References
NZ Herald: Food parcel families made poor choices, says Key (17 Feb 2011)
Scoop: Government Policy Impacting Child Poverty Levels (30 May 2012)
NZ Herald: Poverty not only reason for suicide spike, says Key (30 Oct 2012)
Fairfax Media: Time for a chat on food in schools (7 May 2013)
Additional
Mana Party: Feed the Kids #fact sheet
Facebook: Community Campaign for Food in Schools – NZ
The Children’s Social Health Monitor: Child Poverty and Living Standards
Other blogposts
The Pundit: Children’s Commissioner fronts for Nats on food in schools: Corporate agenda rules
And from the nasty side of Conservative Rightwing politics
“Family First’: Food In Schools Will Feed The Problem
.
.
= fs =
I dispute the need to employ people who can cook food on a large scale. Volunteers could absolutely do this with a bit of instruction (eg you need to plan better and allow additional time for heating due to the volume).
Our maraes have welcomed people through food (large volume) and prisoners cook for large groups of their peers every day. Same is true for some boarding schools although the one I attended only had students doing this at breakfast.
Question is, K, is it fair to rely on volunteers? Especially if parents are at work, or solo-parents are at home looking after smaller children.
Plus, how long do we rely on volunteers? After a while, people burnt out.
My experience with volunteers is that, usually, it falls upon a small minority who do the hard yards. The rest either do nothing, or, a small minority complain that the working volunteers aren’t doing it right.
One good thing about Hone Harawira’s plan is that it’s also a job creation venture. We could end up getting two benefits out of this,
1. Feeding the children,
2. Creating jobs for people out of work
Win/win.
Children’s Commissioner, Dr Russell Wills believes we should have a “chat” about food in schools. I hope he’ll be going hungry during this conversation taking place.
Trouble is, K, that “volunteers” can be another name for unpaid labour. How long can you exploit peoples’ good will? And why should we when there are thousands of people out of work looking for jobs.
If they can do it Europe there’s no reason why we can’t do it here in New Zealand. I refuse to believe it’s difficult at all.
It is obscene that kids are going hungry in a land of plenty!!! I simply cannot believe that this is where we have ended up as a nation and a society.
Shame, shame, shame on us!!!