Home > Media, Social Issues, The Body Politic > Housing Minister Paula Bennett continues National’s spin on rundown State Houses

Housing Minister Paula Bennett continues National’s spin on rundown State Houses

Another broken promise from National…

.

National Party - 2014 election - social housing policy - Housing NZ

.

On 12 June, Social Housing Minister, Paula Bennet was interviewed on Radio NZ’s ‘Nine to Noon‘ programme. Kathryn Ryan asked why there were so many  thousands of State houses in desperate need on maintenance.

In the interview, Bennett claimed that money was not a problem in Housing NZ’s maintenance programme;

@ 4.29

“What I will say is that it’s not a money problem. So there is enough money there for us to get that stock up. It is a big programme of work that is constantly ongoing…

[…]

…So it’s not a matter of neglect.”

And again @ 5.41

“Which is really my point. So we’re saying it’s not actually about the money. The money is there to be spent for maintenance.”

Bennett’s statements were a parroting of  Bill English’s previous claim, made on 5 June  on Radio NZ’s ‘Morning Report‘, who also denied  money was the core problem of run-down Housing NZ properties;

“They’ve done a very large scale programme – insulated every house that it can, which is 48,000 houses over the last four or five years.

It’s got to deal with the same limitations of process as everybody else, it’s got to get consents, it’s got to find a workforce, but it’s not short of money to do the job.”

Bennett and English have both blamed lack of tradesmen and other spurious excuses for rundown houses.

But according to Housing NZ, the reason for our run-down State housing stock is very much a matter of lack of money, as I pointed out to Kathryn Ryan in an email I sent to her during her interview with Bennett;
from: Frank Macskasy <fmacskasy@gmail.com>
to: Nine To Noon RNZ <ninetonoon@radionz.co.nz>
date: Fri, Jun 12, 2015
subject: Paula Bennet on Housing maintenance funding
.

Kia ora Kathryn,Paula Bennett’s assertion that Housing NZ has plenty of funds for maintenance is at variance with this statement from Housing NZ’s 2013/14 Annual Report;

.

The responsive repairs programme, which includes work on vacant properties, is dependent on demand, which was higher than expected in 2013/14. Consequently, the budget was overspent due to higher volumes of work orders. The average cost per work order was also higher as a result of more comprehensive repairs and upgrades being carried out on vacant properties. To mitigate this overspend, we deliberately reduced the planned maintenance programme, which decreased the percentage of maintenance spend on planned activity. [p28]

Furthermore, on page 36 of the 2013/14 Annual Report, Repairs and Maintenance is given as $220 million for the period.This is $1 billion less than the $1.2 billion quoted by Bill English to TVNZ’s Corin Dann on 24 March, this year.

.

Either Bennett is ignorant, or she is spinning.

.

Either way, not a good look.

.

-Frank Macskasy

Ms Ryan read out my email, on air, subsequent to the interview.

Hopefully, the media will pick up on what is obviously a gross distortion from National’s spin doctors. By asserting that  there is no lack of money available, this shifts responsibility from  government to blaming others for lack of maintenance.

It also deflects attention from the fact that National has used Housing NZ as a cash cow by demanding dividends, in a futile attempt by Bill English to balance the government books and post a surplus (which he has also failed at spectacularly), as this ‘Dominion Post‘ editorial highlighted;

This year the Government expects to get $220m in tax and dividends from the corporation. It wants profits as well as social services. And it is also in thrall to its ideology of semi-privatisation.

Housing NZ was explicit in it’s 2013/14 Annual Report;

The responsive repairs programme, which includes work on vacant properties, is dependent on demand, which was higher than expected in 2013/14. Consequently, the budget was overspent due to higher volumes of work orders. The average cost per work order was also higher as a result of more comprehensive repairs and upgrades being carried out on vacant properties. To mitigate this overspend, we deliberately reduced the planned maintenance programme, which decreased the percentage of maintenance spend on planned activity. [p28]

It is up to the media to challenge Ministers when they make assertions that are patently untrue.

.

.

.

References

Radio NZ: The state of state housing

Radio NZ: The state of state housing (audio) (alt. link)

Radio NZ: State housing criticism valid, says English

Government Minister sees history repeat – responsible for death

.

.

.

CGw9SZjUgAA0Shw.

This blogpost was first published on The Daily Blog on 13 June 2015.

.

.

= fs =

  1. Samwise
    23 June 2015 at 10:46 am

    I’ve never known a government to spend so much time lying. The media doesn’t seem to pick up on it much, tho Mathew Hooten is doing a wonderful job on the $11.5 million spent on the Saudi businessman’s farm.

    Carry on, Frank. It’s the bloggers that are letting us know what’s going on.

  2. Priss
    24 June 2015 at 7:22 am

    Well put , Samwise. This government has gutted state housing and as usual with National governments, it is the poor that end up paying. In the late 1990s, National sold off thousands of state houses and hundreds were forced out of their homes. It is a disgrace that New Zealanders alloow this sort of scandal to occur in our own country!

  1. 18 September 2015 at 8:02 am
  2. 6 November 2015 at 8:00 am
  3. 28 November 2015 at 8:02 am
  4. 26 May 2016 at 9:24 am
  5. 5 June 2016 at 10:06 am
  6. 17 June 2016 at 8:01 am
  7. 3 July 2016 at 8:02 am
  8. 15 July 2016 at 8:02 am
  9. 17 July 2016 at 8:03 am
  10. 18 August 2016 at 8:02 am
  11. 20 November 2016 at 8:01 am
  12. 26 May 2017 at 8:02 pm
  13. 3 June 2017 at 8:01 pm
  14. 18 February 2018 at 8:01 am
  15. 23 May 2018 at 8:23 am
  16. 28 May 2018 at 8:03 am
  17. 17 June 2018 at 8:01 am

Leave a comment