Home > Media, The Body Politic > Fear and loathing in the Fascist State of New Zealand – Part Deux

Fear and loathing in the Fascist State of New Zealand – Part Deux

.

Cont’d from: Fear and loathing in the Fascist State of New Zealand

.

This blogger has written to Broadcasting Minister Craig Foss on this issue,

.

from:    Frank Macskasy
to:    Broadcasting Minister Craig Foss <craig.foss@parliament.govt.nz>
date:    Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:44 PM
subject:    NZ on Air

Sir,

Is it simply outrageous that NZ on Air – and more specifically – Board member, Stephen McElrea, is attempting to interfere with  the broadcasting and programming of television documentaries, citing that it might contravene NZ on Air’s impartiality. Specifically, NZ on Air has criticised and condemned TV3’s broadcasting of a documentary on child poverty four days prior to last year’s election.

This is absolute rubbish. It is also dangerous.

It is not – and should not – be mandated to a state owned organisation as to what New Zealand citizens are/aren’t allowed to watch, and when. Then is North Korean or Syrian style of government.

Furthermore, it appears that Board member, Stephen McElrea, is involved in attempting to empower NZ on Air to have authority to determine when specific programmes may be broadcast by independent media,

““The minutes of the NZ On Air board’s meeting in December says it is now considering adding a clause to the broadcast covenant requiring broadcasters not to screen programmes likely to be an election issue during the election period.”” – http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/96173/nzoa-accused-of-political-bias-over-poverty-show

This is outrageous and unacceptable. More so because because Stephen McElrea is deeply connected to the National Party, in his role as a Regional Deputy Chairman, and as John Key’s Electorate Chairperson in the Helensville Electorate.

This is totally unacceptable. Not only is this a gross conflict of interest, but it places NZ On Air’s independence into serious question.

This entire situation demands the following;

1. A new system of appointees to state bodies be set up which may make impartial appointments based solely on merit, rather than political connectivity. Such a reform is necessary if the public are to maintain confidence in our state structure and bodies.

2. Stephen McElrea must step down immediatly from NZ On Air. His position is simply not tenable, and casts a dark shadow over the impartiality of that organisation.

I sincerely hope that the suggestions and comments I have made here are brought to your attenton, as I believe this issue demands your utmost attention.

Regards,
– Frank Macskasy
– “Frankly Speaking“”

.

Any response from the Minister’s office will be published here.

A copy of the email has also bee sent to various media, as it might be of interestr to them that a call has been made for Stephen McElrea’s resignation from “NZ on Air“. I suspect I may not be the only one making that call.

Tom Frewen has also come up with an interesting little matter of the only person to have complained to “NZ on Air“;  a person by the name of  “Alastair Bell”. As Frewen has written, is this the same “Alastair Bell”  who is on the National Party’s Board?

To clarify this matter, I have written to Mr Bell, at the National Party,

.

from:    Frank Macskasy
to:    Alastair Bell <alastair.bell@national.org.nz>
date:    Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:53 PM
subject:    NZ on Air

Kia Ora, Alastair,

Regarding the matter of an email sent to the board of NZ on Air, regarding a complaint about the broadcasting, by TV3 of a documentary, (“Inside Child Poverty”), can you confirm that you are the same Alastair Bell referred to in NZ On Air documents, as released under the Official Information Act?

Regards,
– Frank Macskasy
“Frankly Speaking”

.

Again, any responses will be published here, as I believe it is important to clarify this matter. Keep checking back, for updates.

19 January

Acknowledgement from the Minister’s office, recieved earlier today,

.

from:    Kartini Havell (MIN) kartini.havell@parliament.govt.nz
to:    Frank Macskasy
date:    Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 2:43 PM
subject:    FW: NZ on Air
mailed-by    parliament.govt.nz

Dear Mr Macskasy

Thank you for your email of 18 January 2012 to the Minister of Broadcasting.  The Minister will consider the issues you have raised and respond as soon as he is able.

Best regards

Kartini Havell
Private Secretary – Broadcasting
Office of the Hon Craig Foss
Minister of Broadcasting
Private Bag 18041
Parliament Buildings
WELLINGTON 6160
DDI  04 817 9022    Fax  04 817 6518

.

Response recieved from Chris Foss, nearly a month later,

.

.

I’m not sure if anyone would buy the Minister’s assertion that “the expectation is that all Board members put their political or other affiliations aside when they participate in Board activities“.

Stephen McElrea most certainly did not ” put [his]  political or other affiliations aside ” when he attempted to interfere in TV3’s programme-scheduling over the child poverty documentary.

 

.

Additional

Email address for Broadcasting Minister Craig Foss: craig.foss@parliament.govt.nz

Related Blog post

Fear and loathing in the Fascist State of New Zealand – Part Trois

.

.

  1. Tom Sawyer
    19 January 2012 at 12:39 am

    $100 sez neither of those dicks reply.

    • 25 January 2012 at 11:41 am

      Still no response. You would’ve won that bet, Tom.

  2. 19 January 2012 at 12:44 pm

    No response thus far.

  3. Gem
    19 January 2012 at 2:57 pm

    I just love Neil Walters’ blasé attitude: “NZ On Air chairman Neil Walter said there was no conflict of interest issue because McElrea’s background had been declared” (NZ Herald, 25 March 2011).

    How, exactly, does simply declaring one’s background make conflicts of interest disappear?

    Yes, admitting that you’re in a conflicted situation is a good start and it does go some way to preventing suspicion and perceptions of corruption. However, the admission alone doesn’t magically erase the conflict!

    For instance, admitting you have an alcohol problem shows far more honesty and insight than not declaring it. However, the declaration alone doesn’t mean you’re suddenly a teetotaller.

    Can anyone give any insights into Walters’ logic?

  4. Gem
    19 January 2012 at 3:01 pm

    Gem :I just love Neil Walters’ blasé attitude: “NZ On Air chairman Neil Walter said there was no conflict of interest issue because McElrea’s background had been declared” (NZ Herald, 25 March 2011).
    How, exactly, does simply declaring one’s background make conflicts of interest disappear?
    Yes, admitting that you’re in a conflicted situation is a good start and it does go some way to preventing suspicion and perceptions of corruption. However, the admission alone doesn’t magically erase the conflict!
    For instance, admitting you have an alcohol problem shows far more honesty and insight than not declaring it. However, the declaration alone doesn’t mean you’re suddenly a teetotaller.
    Can anyone give any insights into Walters’ logic?

    Oops – that was meant to go into the first section, not part deux. My bad.

  5. Gem
    19 January 2012 at 3:02 pm

    Tom Sawyer :$100 sez neither of those dicks reply.

    Tom, I admire your bluntness.

  1. 22 May 2012 at 2:59 pm

Leave a comment