Archive

Posts Tagged ‘John Key lying’

The Mendacities of Mr Key #3: tax cuts

2 March 2014 8 comments

.

john key lying

.

3. Tax cuts

Background

19 May 2008

In the bitterly contested lead-up to the 2008 general election, National promised three tax cuts, to be spread over three years.

These were prompted by the nine consecutive Budget surpluses that Labour’s Finance Minister, Michael Cullen, had posted between 2000 and 2008. The public perceived that the government had too much of our money and demanded tax cuts.

Cullen resisted, as his main priority was continuing to pay down billions in debt that Labour had inherited in late 1990s.

.

.

Key  and  National Party strategists heard the insistent  calls for tax cuts, and duly obliged – even though by November 2008, the global financial crisis had plunged the world into a recession, with only Australia and China escaping the worst effects.

In May 2008, Key promised voters tax cuts ‘‘North of $50‘‘.

April 2009

On 1 April 2009, National delivered the first of two rounds of tax cuts (a third round had been scrapped, as by then the recession had blown a hole in the government’s revenue).

This is what the 2009 tax cuts delivered.

.

tax-cuts-april-2009

.

Anyone earning under $40,000 received nothing. Not even close to “north of $50”.

October 2010

The following year, the second round of tax cuts was implemented,

.

Tax rates October 2010

.

Susie Nordqvist wrote in the Herald on 20 May 2010,

* Average income household – $24.71c per week better off

* Average wage worker – $15.91c per week better off

* Couple receiving New Zealand superannuation – $10.77c per week better off

* Professional property investor with 25 properties – $288.18c per week worse off

* Couple saving for their first home – $40.38c per week better off

* Domestic purposes beneficiary – $2.45c per week better off

* Minimum wage worker – $6.36c per week better off

* Student – $2.66c per week better off

* Business owner structuring income to claim for Working for Families – $153.03c per week worse off.

As the reader can easily determine, very few in the above group were receiving “north of $50”. When the rise in GST was taken into account, the actual real cut in  taxes for average workers’ and families was reduced even further.

The only tax bracket that received a tax cut “north of $50” were those earning around $80,000 or more. Such as government ministers. And John Key.

When you factor in the rise in GST from 12.5%  to 15% – even fewer got the much promised “north of $50”, except the wealthiest.

.

Key defends tax cuts for wealthy

.

Conclusions:

  1. Key had no choice but to cancel the third round of tax cuts (scheduled for 2011), and to reduce the amount on offer. The GFC and recession were biting into our economy so badly, that National was borrowing $450 million a week by the end of 2009. Adding the 2010 tax cuts into the mix eventually left this country with a $60 billion fiscal hole.
  2. Key knew that the tax cuts were unaffordable during the 2008 election campaign. The world was deeply mired in the global financial crisis and recessionary effects were beginning to hit economies around the world. To pursue the promised tax cuts was the height of irresponsibility.
  3. Key bought the election with unaffordable promises.
  4. Our debt will have to be re-paid. (Foreign creditors insist.)

Beware of politicians bearing promises and gifts. We will be the ones paying for it.

Charge: broken promise/deflection/half-truth/hypocrisy/outright lie/mis-information?

Verdict:  Outright Lie, Broken Promise

 

.

*

.

References

NZ Herald: Cullen – Tax cuts but strict conditions

Trading Economics:  New Zealand Government Debt To GDP

Dominion Post: Nats set for $50 tax cut trump

Otago Daily Times: Key says donate tax cuts to charity

NZ Herald: Budget 2010: What the tax cuts mean for you

NZ herald: Key defends tax cuts for wealthy

Parliament:  Tax System Changes—Impact on Operating Balance

Otago Daily Times: Government now borrowing $450 million a week – claim

Radio NZ:  English confirms national debt set to rise

Previous related blogposts

Labour: the Economic Record 2000 – 2008

The Mendacities of Mr Key #2: Secret Sources

.

*

.

Vote these traitors out

Above image acknowledgment: Francis Owen

.

.

= fs =

Advertisements

Letter to the Editor: Why should I believe John Key?

25 February 2014 1 comment

.

old-paper-with-quill-pen-vector_34-14879

.

FROM:    "f.macskasy" <f.macskasy@clear.net.nz>
SUBJECT:  Letters to the editor
DATE:     Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:33:27 +1300
TO:      "Sunday Star Times" <letters@star-times.co.nz> 

.

The Editor
Sunday Star Times

.

John Key's promise not to sell any other state assets should
National be re-elected should be treated with suspicion and
caution.

Key's track record in breaking promises and "bending the
truth" is now legendary, whether it be his promise not to
raise GST (which he did) or to strengthen the Emissions
Trading Scheme (which he watered down) or, in 2008, when he
campaigned on implementing food in schools - only to resist
introducing the programme later on.

Plus he has been less than honest in describing the GCSB
Bill as "not fit for purpose" and "vague" - when it was
crystal clear in stating that the Bureau could not spy on
New Zealanders and permanent residents.

Key habitually makes promises or statements of fact which
he breaks with flimsy excuses to justify his actions.

This is not a Prime Minister who can easily be taken at his
word.

-Frank Macskasy
(address and phone number supplied)

 

.

*

.

FROM:   "f.macskasy" 
SUBJECT: Letters to the editor
DATE:    Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:18:31 +1300
TO:     "NZ Herald" <letters@herald.co.nz> 

.

The Editor
NZ Herald

.

John Key's "reassurance" that his government has no further
plans to sell other state assets is simply not credible.

His reputation for "bending the truth" and broken promises
is now widespread. Who can forget his promise not to raise
GST - which he broke with flippant excuses.

Or his assertions that the GCSB Act  was "vague and unclear"
- when in fact it was crystal clear in stating that the
Bureau could not spy on New Zealand citizens and permanent
residents?

Or his reference in October 2011, to a mysterious Standard &
Poors email, claiming that the ratings agency would have
downgraded NZ if Labour had been in office? Standard and
Poors immediatly rejected they made any such statement.

I have no reason to take Mr Key at his word. His reputation
precedes him.

-Frank Macskasy
(address and phone number supplied)


.

*

.

FROM:   "f.macskasy" 
SUBJECT: Letters to the editor
DATE:    Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:58:42 +1300
TO:     "Dominion Post" <letters@dompost.co.nz> 
.
The Editor
Dominion Post

.

John Key has announced that his government will not sell any
other state assets should National be re-elected later this
year.

It is hard to believe a Prime Minister who has made so many
promises and statements which have either turned out not to
be true; a distortion of the truth; or outright mistruths.
His broken promises such as not raising GST and raising
wages to parity with Australia have all been broken.

There is an old saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me
twice, shame on me".

I prefer not to be fooled a second time.

I simply don't believe him.

-Frank Macskasy
(address and phone number supplied)

.

*

.

References

NZ Herald: PM: no more SOEs to sell after Genesis

Radio NZ: No more asset sales? Cunliffe doesn’t believe it

 

.

*

.

referendum election

Above image acknowledgment: Francis Owen

.

.

= fs =

The Mendacities of Mr Key #2: Secret Sources

24 February 2014 3 comments

.

key's credibility takes a hit

.

In an on-going series, we will look at the half-truths; mis-representations; omissions; and outright lies, told by Dear Leader John Key.

2. Secret Sources

Background

On 4 October 2011, John Key made this astounding statement in the Debating Chamber,

When Standard & Poor’s were giving a meeting in New Zealand about a month ago, what they did say was there was about a 30% chance we would be downgraded – that’s what happens when you’re on negative outlook. They did go on to say though, if there was a change of government, that downgrade would be much more likely.”

The comment was made under Parliamentary privilege.

Five days later, on 10 October, Key “explained” that the comments had come to him in an email, from an un-named “friend”. He duly released the text,

.

.

When Standard and Poors heard Key’s comment, they were none too pleased.  Standard and Poor’s sovereign rating analyst, Kyran Curry, who attended the Auckland meeting that the “email” referred to, replied,

“In Auckland last month, I might have talked about the importance of the Government maintaining a strong fiscal position in the medium term but I would never have touched on individual parties. It is something we just don’t do. We don’t rate political parties. We rate Governments.”

Key fronted to a media conference and was grilled by journalists,

.

.

His body language, tone of voice, and other minute clues all indicate he was being less than honest. I leave it to the reader to reach their own conclusion how honest Dear Leader was.

In my opinion, John Key lied and the email was subsequently fabricated.

Nearly two and a half years later, and Key is embroiled in yet another “secret sources” mess;

On 12 February, Key disclosed that Winston Peters had met with Kim Dotcom, at his mansion in Coatsville, three times. Peters accused Key of using the GCSB/SIS to spy on him, saying,

“What’s his informant, who is he? … This is is a surveillance matter and I want to know more about it.”

Key responded the same day,

“I heard from an individual who’s a person who’s got nothing to do with National Party, nothing to do with any government agency. The person told me it was three. I was pretty sure they’d be right – because they often are – and guess what, they were.”

On the 13th of February, Key stated,

“I can absolutely categorically tell you it’s got nothing to do with an official agency. From time to time people see things and from time to time people tell me.”

Key added,

“Contrary to what [Peters] might want to believe, I can read. A member of the public, for want of a better term rang me up and said what was the case. I assumed it was right. I said it, it turned out to be right. I didn’t think it was that controversial, to be honest.”

So did a member of the public” phone Key and inform him that Peters had visited Kim Dotcom? Or did Key “read” about it somewhere?

When questioned by the media, Slater told the Herald,

“If the Prime Minister says I’m a source, I guess I must have been.”

Which kind of makes Key’s earlier assertion that he “heard from an individual who’s a person who’s got nothing to do with National Party” a complete lie. As we all know, Slater is closely connecxted to the National Party; his father (John Slater) is an ex-President of the National Party; and Slater is probably a paid up member of the National Party.

Unless it is Slater who is lying (which is equally plausible as he has a reputation  for telling lies)? Otherwise, if Slater is telling the truth, then he has landed Key in it.

One of them is lying.

Take your pick.

Conclusions:

Key had not been forthcoming either on the Standard and Poors “email” or on where he got the tip-off that Winston Peters had visited Kim Dotcom.

What is equally disturbing is that Key is willing to use private information to smear a political opponant. Not since Paula Bennet released information on Natasha Fuller and Jennifer Johnston, has a politician willfully invaded another person’s privacy.

Whatever one may think of Winston Peters – and I am no fan of his – Peters deserves his privacy like anyone else.

Charge: broken promise/deflection/half-truth/hypocrisy/outright lie/mis-information?

Verdict: Mis-information, (probable) outright lie

 

.

*

.

References

NZ Parliament: Credit Rating Downgrade—Effect on Economy

TV3: Key accused of lying in Parliament over downgrade

Previous related blogposts

Nick Smith

Politicians never tell fibs

The Mendacities of Mr Key #1: The GCSB Bill

.

*

.

1504434_636268686433547_1633036652_o

Above image acknowledgment: Francis Owen

This blogpost was first published on The Daily Blog on 17 February 2014.

.

.

= fs =

How can you tell John Key is lying?

17 September 2013 2 comments

… His lips are moving.

Ok, it’s an old, old joke.

But it seems to be a truism more and more each day, as his shonkey government flounders, that he is resorting to untruths in panic and desperation.

A recent example, as reported on Radio NZ on 10 September,

Key predicts new Labour leader will take party to left

[abridged]

“It’s very important to understand whose voting. It’s not New Zealand mums or dads that are voting. It’s actually the union movement and they will want payback time when he becomes the leader and that means a big move to the left. And ultimately I think that will have quite a negative impact on jobs and growth for the economy.”

Source: Radio NZ

As the RNZ report went on to state, “under the Labour party’s new rules, unions get only a fifth of vote“.

40% of the vote –  nearly half – will be from  New Zealand mums or dads  that are voting (or those who are members of the Labour Party).

So once again, Dear Leader is caught out fibbing to the media and the public.

Which is interesting and ties in with a chat I was having at a Dunedin New World supermarket last night (11 Sept). Two young check-out operators noticed my “no asset sales” sticker on my satchel and we starting chatting about the Labour party leadership contest. For two young teenagers (17? 18?) they seemed remarkably well-versed in who the candidates were and their personal preferences. Then the subject got on to John Key.

The opinions of these two young women was simple; they did not trust him one bit. They also could not understand why he was so popular with the public. One remarked that his “body language” alone showed he was being dishonest when speaking to the media. The other was put off by his “we-know-best” arrogance.

In my travels, I’m meeting more and more people who are disenchanted and disillusioned with our current truth-bending Prime Minister. People are not fools and eventually pick up on a politician’s propensity for spinning BS.

But here’s a question for Mr Key; when will he allow the rank and file membership  to vote to choose the leader of the National Party?

Because under current National Party rules,  “mums and dads” have no say on the matter.

This blogpost was first published on The Daily Blog on 13 September 2013.

.

.

= fs =

Our national anthem…

1 August 2013 11 comments

.

 

 

New-Zealand-240-animated-flag-gifs.

.

God of Nations at Thy feet,
In the bonds of love we meet,
Hear our voices, we entreat,
God defend our free land.
Guard Pacific’s triple star
From the shafts of strife and war,
Make her praises heard afar,
God defend New Zealand.

 

Now I understand why we implore “God defend our free land”.

Because as our lying Prime Minister and corrupt government  run roughshod over our civil liberties; spy and snoop at will; plan to turn our once-liberal nation into a fully-fledged, Stasi-style, Surveillance State…

… half the population are asleep and don’t seem to give a shit.

How else does one explanation the latest Roy Morgan poll?!?!

National Party:  51% (+ 4%)

Maori Party: 1.5% (- 0.5%)

ACT NZ: 1% (+ 0.5%)

United Future: 0%

Labour: 29% (- 2%);

Greens:10% (- 1.5%),

New Zealand First: 4% (- 0.5%),

Mana Party: 1% (- 0.5%),

Conservative Party of NZ: 1.5% (unchanged)

Others 1% (up 0.5%).

(Roy Morgan: This latest New Zealand Roy Morgan Poll on voting intention was conducted by telephone – both landline and mobile telephone, with a NZ wide cross-section of 824 electors from July 15-28, 2013. Of all electors surveyed 4% (unchanged) didn’t name a party.Source)

So according to this, if Key burned down Parliament; annexed Tasmania; and declared the country a One Party state with himself as Leader-for-Life – his popularity would soar into the stratosphere?!

Jeezus H, I had no idea that a collective longing for soft-fascism was so deeply ingrained in our culture.

Silly me, I thought Muldoon was an aberration.

.

.

= fs =

Facepalm #4: John Key (again)

From a speech John Key made in January 2008

.

"Well, I've got a challenge for the Prime Minister.  Before she asks for another three years, why doesn't she answer the questions Kiwis are really asking, like... [...]    Why are grocery and petrol prices going through the roof?"

“Well, I’ve got a challenge for the Prime Minister. Before she asks for another three years, why doesn’t she answer the questions Kiwis are really asking, like…
[…] Why are grocery and petrol prices going through the roof?”

Acknowledgement:  SPEECH: 2008: A Fresh Start for New Zealand

.

Five years of National government later,

.

NZ petrol prices reach record high

Acknowledgement:  NZ Herald – NZ petrol prices reach record high

.

Yes, Dear Leader – Why are grocery and petrol prices going through the roof ?”

.

johnstewart_facepalm

.

.

= fs =

Facepalm #3: John Key

On TV3 News tonight…

.

John Key - Kim Dotcom - GCSB

Acknowledgement: TV3 – Did Key lie, or is Dotcom bluffing?

.

One of the worst interviews from Key. His comments had to be heard to be believed…

.

Did Key lie, or is Dotcom bluffing1

0:45 – “He makes so many claims that are just factually incorrect..”

.

Not true.

In fact, to date, every claim that Kim Dotcom made in regards to John Banks has been proven to be true. Not one statement from Dotcom has been disproven as a lie.

Either Key was woefully ignorant of this fact – or once again he has deceived the public.

.

Did Key lie, or is Dotcom bluffing2

0:56 “And to the best of all the records that we’ve checked and we’ve gone extensively through every  record my office holds, there is no evidence that we can point to we’ve heard of the guy, prior to the 19th of January 2012.”

.

So why does Key have to  go “through every record my office holds ” to answer a simple question whether or not he knew of Kim Dotcom much earlier than he has admitted? Surely he would know this without having to go through his office records?!

Why also is Key referring to “there is no evidence that we can point to we’ve heard of the guy” when his own memory should be sufficient? Why does he need to check if evidence exists or not?

Evidence of what?

.

Did Key lie, or is Dotcom bluffing3

2:09: “The man is a conspiracy theorist. He makes things up.”

.

He makes things up“?!?!

Key is accusing other people of “making things up”?!?!

John Key is perhaps the most dishonest Prime Minister we have seen. He bends the truth to suit the situation. He is conveniently forgetful to such a degree that the term “brain fade” has entered common usage. His reputation for making it up as he goes along is now common knowledge.

As I wrote before; Kim Dotcom has been 100% up-front with the people of New Zealand and has never been caught out lying or even bending the truth.

The same cannot be said of John Key or John Banks.

.

A Special Facepalm for John Key

.

.

= fs =