Home > The Body Politic > Letter to the Editor – tax cuts bribes? Are we smarter than that?

Letter to the Editor – tax cuts bribes? Are we smarter than that?

.

Frank Macskasy - letters to the editor - Frankly Speaking

.

from: Frank Macskasy <fmacskasy@gmail.com>
to: Sunday Star Times <letters@star-times.co.nz>
date: Thu, Sep 4, 2014
subject: Letters to the editor

 

.

 

The editor

Sunday Star Times

.

National must be in panic-mode if they are resorting to the tactic of bribing voters with promised tax cuts.

Key and English both maintain that the government’s books will be “back in surplus” next year.

That is not the whole truth. In  fact, it is a lie.

The government (and therefore taxpayers) owe $68 billion in debt that this government has borrowed since 2008.

On top of that, the dairy pay-out to farmers is expected to fall dramatically, taking more revenue out of the economy and reducing the government’s tax-take.

And we still have billions to spend on re-building Christchurch.

In the light of this, it is grossly irresponsible for any politician to be making promises that are simply unsustainable.  Tax cuts will have to be paid for and simply putting it “on tick” and adding it to the $68 billion debt is verging on criminal negligence.

I sincerely hope that voters think carefully before accepting this bribe. We should be smarter than that.-Frank Macskasy

.

 

[address & phone number supplied]

 


 

.

Skipping voting is not rebellion its surrender

Above image acknowledgment: Francis Owen/Lurch Left Memes

.

.

= fs =

Advertisements
  1. 7 September 2014 at 9:20 pm

    Published today in the SST!

  2. 9 September 2014 at 10:09 am

    You got the criminal negligence part right Frank. I’m so over election bribes. This one is perfect example of hypocrisy when you consider Labour got stick over it’s miniscule tax cut offer when they were indeed trying to stay in surplus. This is a sad indictment as to where our current government’s accountability is at. I still don’t get how they can claim operating surpluses when they’re $68b in the can.

    Just my ignorance I assume.

  1. 22 May 2016 at 8:53 am
  2. 27 May 2016 at 8:04 am
  3. 7 June 2016 at 8:03 am
  4. 25 February 2017 at 8:01 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: