Home > The Body Politic > Why a Four Year Parliamentary Term is not a Good Idea – Part Rua

Why a Four Year Parliamentary Term is not a Good Idea – Part Rua




On 7 February, Key called for the Parliamentary term to be increased from three to four years.

This issue was canvassed in two previous referenda in 1968 and 1990. More than two-thirds of voters wisely voted to keep it at three years.

According to polling, the public response is narrower this time. Perhaps in part to the same polling method that seems to show National with 50%-plus support amongst the public.

This blogger thoroughly rejects any notion  to increase the Parliamentary term.

As I wrote previously in The Daily Blog, there are compelling reasons to deny politicians an additional year in office;

1. Attacks on Critics

Governments become arrogant over time, and National’s (mis)-treatment over it critics should give us great cause for concern.

The following is a  list of just  some of the people who have criticised this government and been abused or derided in return;

July, 2009

Natasha Fuller &  Jennifer Johnston, solo-mothers

Personal WINZ details released to the media by Social Welfare Minister, Paula Bennett, to discredit both women after they criticised National for canning the Training Incentive Allowance (which Bennett herself used to pay her way through University).

May, 2011

Jon Stephenson, journalist
John Key derides Stephenson’s research into NZ activities in Afghanistan: “I’ve got no reason for NZDF to be lying, and I’ve found [Stephenson] myself personally not to be credible.”

September, 2011

Nicky Hager, writer, researcher
John Key dismisses Hager’s book, on CIA involvement in NZ military activities in Afghanistan:  “I don’t have time to read fiction,” quipped the Prime Minister, adding that the book contained “no smoking gun”, just supposition, which, “makes it business as normal for Nicky Hager”. (Despite the book having 1300 footnotes to referencing documentation.)

October, 2011

Martyn “Bomber” Bradbury, broadcaster, blogger
Criticised John Key on Radio NZ. Subsequently banned/ “uninvited”  from returning to Radio NZ as a panellist for the Afternoons with Jim Mora segment.

November, 2011

Robyn Malcolm, actor
Criticises the John Key led National government for it’s failures at a Green Party campaign launch, and is, in turn, vilified by the ‘NZ Herald’, and by one-time National Party aspiring-candidate, Cameron Brewer.

November, 2011

Bradley Ambrose, journalist/photographer
Investigated by police after complaint laid by the Prime Minister, over the “Teapot Tape” affair. Ambrose investigated and interviewed by Police. Media office raided. Property seized. Eventually, no charges laid. Government considered seeking costs of $13,669.45 from Ambrose – but eventually decided not to.

March, 2013

Annette Sykes, lawyer, activist, President of Mana Party

When Annette Sykes criticised the appointment of sportswoman Susan Devoy to the role of Race Relations Commissioner, Minister Judith Collins responded with “Annette Sykes is a stupid person”. That’s how National views critics.

There is a degree of  vindictiveness to how National ministers deal with their criticism – and it ain’t pretty, Billy-Bob.

In addition, John Key’s response to  anti-asset sales opposition has revealed glimpses of his arrogance and dismissal of public concerns.

2. Public Opposition

As I wrote in The Daily Daily, on 4 May 2012,  over five thousand people took part in a peaceful,  anti-asset sales Hikoi to Parliament,


Aotearoa is not for sale hikoi - anti asset sales march   - wellington - 4 May 2012


Key’s response was instructive,

“How many people did they have? John Key asked reporters. “Where was it? Nope wasn’t aware of it.”

Key says the National Party has a clear mandate to proceed with privatising some state assets.

“Well over a million New Zealanders voted for National in the full knowledge we were going to undertake the mixed ownership model,” he said.

“So look, a few thousand people walking down the streets of Wellington isn’t going to change my mind.”

Source: Key unfazed as protesters descend on Parliament

Nearly a year later, on 12 March, a 392,000-plus signature petition was presented to Parliament. The petition  was  signed by ordinary New Zealanders who wanted nothing more or less than a say in their future.




Key’s response?

Key said of the opposition petition you could be as “sure as little green apples [that] huge numbers of them are not bona fide names on the list” and would have to be struck off.

“They’ve probably taken over a year to get maybe 300,000 names, we’ve had 285,000 pre-registrations in a matter of days”.

Source: Government to ignore asset sales referendum

And according to Green Party co-leader, Russell Norman, Key further disparaged New Zealanders who signed  the petition by saying,

“…that the Prime Minister has said the people who signed this are children and tourists….”

Source: IBID


We should be under no illusion that National ministers view any form of criticism or opposition with disdain. Key himself is contemptuous of  anyone who dares cross him.

Who in their right minds would want to give politicians an extra year to look down on us, as if we were grubby peasants, not worthy of their time and attention?

3. Unbridled Power?

Never forget that we are governed by an “elected dictatorship”,

  • There is no Upper House to scrutinise legislation from governments.
  • There is no written constitution to safeguard our interests.
  • Referenda have all the ‘bite’ of a toothless octagenarian (not that I support binding referenda – especially without Constitutional safeguards to protect the rights of minorities).
  • There are no mid-term elections; right-of-recall; Presidential Veto; or any other controls over elected representatives.

Once elected, unless a Member of Parliament is found guilty of a lewd act with a sheep, we have zero control over them.




In conclusion

One of the main arguments in support of a Four Year Term is that three years is not sufficient time  for a government…

To which I respond with this;

That statement is never completed. It gives government more time to achieve – what? What incredibly complex, radical reforms are there that require an extra year (or more) for a government to have more time? What does Key have in mind that demands a four year term?

Remember that Select Committees work in unison, not one at a time, and Legislation can be passed in as little as 48 hours – as “The Hobbit Law” showed us (see: Helen Kelly – The Hobbit Dispute) – not that I’m advocating legislative changes conducted at warp speed.

Perhaps governments might have “more time to achieve things” if time wasn’t wasted with petty point-scoring in the Debating Chamber?  (see: Making Bold With The Speaker’s Chair)

As National-aligned blogger, David Farrar,  said in the NZ Herald on 25 March,

“People do feel three years is not long enough to judge. With a four-year term, more Governments might get chucked out after one term because people would say, ‘It’s been four years, we should have seen some impact.”‘

Really, Mr Farrar?

Funny thing…

National has now been in power for over four years.

What have they achieved in that time?

  • growing child poverty?
  • rising unemployment?
  • large numbers continuing to migrate to Australia?
  • wage cuts for 16-19 year olds?
  • taxpayer funded subsidies for Big Business?
  • taxcuts for the rich?
  • increased GST and other government charges for the poor?
  • lowing environbment standards and more pollution?
  • continuing attacks on the unemployed, solo-mums, etc?
  • no job creation policies?
  • continuing attacks on worker’s rights?
  • no comprehensive training for 85,000+ unemployed youth?
  • importing foreign workers instead of training our own unemployed?
  • state asset sales despite over-whelming opposition?
  • high dollar damanging our export sector?
  • more dodgy deals like pokie-machines for Skycity?
  • increasing foreign debt?
  • closing schools?
  • planned mining in Conservation lands?
  • etc, etc, etc…

As pro-National blogger David Farrar stated,

“It’s been four years, we should have seen some impact.”‘

Damn right, Mr  Farrar, damn right.


When you stop voting




Previous related blogpost

Why a Four Year Parliamentary Term is not a Good Idea  (15 March 2013)


Wikipedia: Election Day (United States)

NZ Herald: Food parcel families made poor choices, says Key (17 Feb 2011)

NZ Herald: PM attacks journalist over SAS torture claims (3 May 2011)

NZ Herald: Charities’ food handouts at record after Govt cuts (18 Oct 2011)

TVNZ: Key unfazed as protesters descend on Parliament (4 May 2012)

Fairfax media: PM John Key Wants Four-Year Term For Parliament (7 Feb 2013)

Fairfax media: Government to ignore asset sales referendum (12 March 2013)

NZ Herald:  Voters divided on four-year term  (25 March 2013)



= fs =

  1. Possum
    29 March 2013 at 1:50 pm

    l still argue 2 stay at 3yrs and even that is 2 long 4 some of the idea’s they are putting through

  2. Janya
    29 March 2013 at 2:05 pm

    Well written. Reading the Judith Collins putdown made me smile. A suitable retort would have been “takes one to know one”. Absolutely agree that resorting to personal putdown is designed to deflect from the speaker’s lack of THEIR substance/integrity – and that is what we have had for 4 years now – three years is more than enough!

  3. Alison W
    29 March 2013 at 2:44 pm

    NO! NEVER! Just NO!!!

  4. Paul Carruthers
    29 March 2013 at 2:54 pm

    Is David Farrar on drugs?

    “It’s been four years, we should have seen some impact.”‘

    That’s like saying “I only killed him a little bit, your honour”.

    If David Farrar, or any other of the myopic lemmings who support this government, can’t assess the profound impact this government has had on our economy or society then someone should turn off their bloody life support because they are positively brain-dead.

  5. CW
    29 March 2013 at 2:57 pm

    they don’t deserve to have another second governing our country!

  6. 29 March 2013 at 4:05 pm

    We have seen some impact – things have gotten worse for the majority at the bottom and much, much better for the 1% at the top – just as National promised.

    • 30 March 2013 at 4:42 pm

      That was an excellent piece on “The Standard”, Draco. Thanks for sharing that item with us – it’s well worth a read by everyone. *thumbs up*

  7. 29 March 2013 at 5:15 pm

    It is a bad idea with the standard of parliamentarians we have…

  8. Denny Weisz
    29 March 2013 at 8:36 pm

    I’m all for compromise … a 4 year term for any government other that a Tory government! They get no more than 2 years because that’s all the time they need to fuck things up!

  9. mick
    30 March 2013 at 2:16 pm

    We need the Swiss system ,where elected officials are only part timers ! They have to support themselves and only get paid by the people when in session ! Switzerland is comparable in population and why are we paying for Key to take holidays all around the world ? I know he does less harm than when he is in session but look at the holidays we have paid for so far this year ! Delusions of grandeur are OK as long as we don’t have to pay the cheque !So fuck four years ,”Bush of the South Pacific”(Key) has had to much of a free ride as it is .

  10. Alison W
    30 March 2013 at 5:22 pm

    The PTSD following Key’s reign of tyranny is going to be bad enough, and if he gets in for another term……………FARK!

    • Denny Weisz
      30 March 2013 at 6:43 pm

      Ae Alison. That’s why we have to get the 880,000 that didn’t vote, out to vote in 2014. Otherwise the only place in NZ that will be safe is Tuhoe country if they get their own state, soveriegnty & tax system (Utopia)! I doubt if the TPPA will touch them! Haha!

      • Alison W
        30 March 2013 at 6:53 pm

        I will personally visit all of those who, for whatever reasons, don’t want to vote, and hold a gun to their head as I put the voting form in front of them! LOL

        • 30 March 2013 at 11:29 pm

          Better than a gun, I will NAG, and NAG, and NAG, until they get out and vote. Much more effective… 😉

  11. pj
    30 March 2013 at 9:28 pm

    No never give Planet Shonkey anymore time 1 day is 1 day to much time with him.
    Another extra year for him to destroy the Country would be worse.
    That Achieved list is disgusting.

  12. P.Mc.
    30 March 2013 at 11:14 pm

    3years is long enougth..

  1. 23 May 2015 at 8:01 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: