Home > A Little Blue Marble Called Earth, Dollars & Sense, Social Issues, The Body Politic > Johnny’s Report Card – National Standards Assessment y/e 2012: crime

Johnny’s Report Card – National Standards Assessment y/e 2012: crime

To Whom It May Concern; the following Report Card detail’s Johnny’s achievements over the last four years.

The following contrasts compare four years, ranging from the end of 2008 to the end of this year, 2012.

Whilst it is acknowledged that the Global Financial Crisis impacted harshly on our society and economy, it is also fair to say that National has had the benefits of starting out with a sound economy (surpluses, low unemployment, etc)  in 2008 and four years in office to make good on it’s election promises.




National hoarding staying strong on crime


The rhetoric

We also need to ensure there is effective policing in all parts of our cities and in all areas of the country. We will not tolerate violence and antisocial behaviour. Under a National government, gangs will not be controlling neighbourhoods so posties can’t even deliver the daily mail.

The tragic events surrounding the parole of Graeme Burton show that Labour’s law and order policies seem to be based on the rights of criminals.

Let me say that under National, the parole system will be focused on protecting innocent Kiwis from hardened, unrepentant and dangerous criminals. Under any government I lead there will be no parole for repeat violent offenders.

We will do more than that to improve our criminal justice system, but for today let me send the clearest of messages. Those who break the laws of our society destroy the fabric of The Kiwi Way. No government I lead will put up with that. ” – John Key, 30 January 2007

See: The Kiwi Way: A Fair Go For All

Law and order is to National what environmentalism is to the Greens; it’s ‘raw meat’ for their conservative constituents – many of whom have little understanding nor interest in the root causes of crime. Poverty, unemployment; a growing wealth gap; hopelessness; alienation – these are   inconceivable to many National supporters.

So Key and his National  cronies, spin doctors, and Party strategists are on solid ground when it comes to this issue. Throw in a bit of beneficiary bashing…

We also have a serious and growing problem with long-term welfare dependency.”


And a bit of brown bashing…

I don’t think that’s necessary and I think my view is widely held by a lot of New Zealanders. If it was holding New Zealand back, sure we could arguably go and do that but that’s not where I see these things going. He can make any claims he likes. The Maori King entitled to a different view to mine, it doesn’t mean I’m culturally ignorant.

I don’t think it’s right. If someone wants to take that land grab, they can give it a go.

See: Government could nationalise water – Key

… and the Nats are practically guaranteed the government. Never underestimate the casual racism of a significant sector of our society.

This racism plays into the hands of National who regularly tap such latent conservative streaks in our society for their own political agenda.

More rhetoric

The Government is committed to keeping New Zealanders safe – on our streets and in our communities. We’ve delivered the lowest crime rate in 30 years, but we want to continue to keep driving the crime rate down.” – John Key, 3 July 2012

See: Prime Minister welcomes first action plan

Key has taken credit for a “drop” in crime on several occassions this year. But is he telling the truth? Telling lies? Or bending the truth and misrepresenting the facts to suit his Party’s agenda?

Let’s check the stats from NZ Police, shall we?

Crime trends for the year ending June 2008,


Crime Statistics year ending 30 June 2008 - New Zealand Police



And crime trends up to 2012,


NZ Crime Statistics 2011-2012



And guess what…?

The trends clearly show a gradual reduction of reported crime since 1996/97.

For Key to claim this as a “success” for his administration reminds us, yet again, that the man will bend the truth to suit his demands. Quite simply, the drop in crime has been ongoing for the last sixteen years and has little to do with Dear Leader and his Party’s policies.

Reported crime was also dropping druring the 2000-08 Labour-led government.

Will John Key take credit for that “success” as well?


If, as data shows, and as Key has been crowing, crime has been steadily reducing since 1996, why is National committing to spending $300 million for a new prison at Wiri, South Auckland, and a further $540 million to operate and maintain? That is $840 million of our taxes that could be better invested in upgrading delapidated state houses and raising this country’s children out of poverty.

See: Fletcher signs $300m Wiri prison contract

Could it be that the motivation lies with providing a profitable Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) with Fletcher Building,  Serco, Spotless Facility Services,  John Laing, InfraRed, Accident Compensation Corporation, and  Macquarie Capital? That’s nearly $1 billion going to private corporations for a prison we seem not to need.

Who sez crime doesn’t pay?





= fs =

  1. Theodore
    9 January 2013 at 11:44 pm

    ROFL!! You nailed Key perfectly Frank. The prick tried to take credit for the drop in crime and no one else in the media has caught on.

  2. 10 January 2013 at 1:14 am

    Yes, this one was indeed a goodie especially as this is such a dog whistle issue 🙂

    • 10 January 2013 at 12:20 pm

      Thanks, Theodore.

      Indeed, Alan. Law & Order is raw meat for Tories and it’s ironic that they’ve had very little to do with the drop in crime rates.

      Hopefully the next time a National MP brings this up at a public meeting, someone will have the facts and figures to throw at them.

  3. cav39
    10 January 2013 at 10:34 am

    Regarding your statement “The trends clearly show a gradual reduction of reported crime since 1996/97”, there’s a remarkable study on the long-term effect of phasing out lead in the environment. You can read about it at:

    • 10 January 2013 at 12:35 pm

      Cav39 – fascinating article. And one that I belireve merits further study.

      Even if lead doesn’t cause violence and crime (social factors such as poverty, unemployment, and social alienation are still major factors, I believe), the stuff is so toxic that it should be banned from as many consumer goods as possible.

      The interesting thing about that article were the head-in-the-sand comments left by some respondents. Their attitudes displayed a shocking callous indifference and wilful ignorance that I find hard to understand.

      Thank you. I’ve bookmarked the article for future reference.

  1. 9 January 2013 at 5:38 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: