Home > The Body Politic > Prime Minister commits NZ troops to next US-led conflict zone!

Prime Minister commits NZ troops to next US-led conflict zone!

.

Correction and apology

4.ooPM *Update*

It now appears that the following quote;

New Zealand warmly supports the United States rebalancing towards the Asia Pacific, and we welcome the opportunity to cooperate with the U.S. in the next conflicts.”

… was transcribed erroneously by the US State Department.

The words “conflicts” was mistaken recorded instead of “contexts”. The US State Department page has since been amended,

.

Source

.

Russell Brown posted this link to Key’s actual words,

http://publicaddress.net/assets/upload/269061/986065130/key.mp3

.

Whilst highly critical of many of National’s policies and John Key’s actions, this blogger strives to present only that which is factual.  Accordingly, this blogger retracts the story below (which many would have read) and regrets and apologises unreservedly for any embarressment caused to the Prime Minister.

– Frank Macskasy
4 September 2012

.

*

.

.

.

Blogger s have unearthed information indicating that John Key is willing to commit New Zealand armed forces to upcoming conflicts.

According to the US State Department, they reported Key as saying,

New Zealand warmly supports the United States rebalancing towards the Asia Pacific, and we welcome the opportunity to cooperate with the U.S. in the next conflicts.”

No wonder Dear Leader was warm and chummy with  Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton (see above).

Key “welcomes” getting involved  “in the next conflicts”?

One wonders what conflicts Key has in mind? What possible “next conflicts”  are being lined up by the Pentagon where Key  ” welcomes the opportunity to cooperate with the U.S. “?

This should be of grave (!) concern to all New Zealanders.

.

Full story

.
One particular cause for concern is that the  American taste for neo-imperialism in the Middle East, to secure regions of oil production for US needs, shows no sign of abating.

The war drums and propagandising over Iran are heating up.  America’s faithful ally/client state in the Middle East, Israel, is straining at the leash to be let loose on the Iranian state.

See:  Israeli leader demands “clear red line” on Iran

See:  Get tougher on Iran over its nuclear ambitions, Israel tells world

There is also an escalation of American activities in the Pacific, to counter a perception of growing Chinese “influence”.

See:  US moves to counter China in Pacific

See:  U.S. and allies move to counter Chinese power

Only a madman would even contemplate getting further involved in American military adventurism.  Surely, Key would not be that madman?! Or would he?

.

.

As Key screamed hysterically in that clip, in 2003,

Our traditional allies are in there, in this agreement. Where’s our name? Missing! MIA! Just like it was in the war in Iraq, missing! And this country will, this country will pay for that, don’t you worry about that, don’t you worry about thatThere will be no  free-trade arrangement here in  New Zealand [with the USA]. That’ll be one thing we won’t have to worry about is container ships going to America, because there’ll  be none of them  leaving out of this country because there’ll  be no free-trade arrangement because of the shambles, the absolute shambles,  the Government  made of that position… “

If anything has been made quite clear is that John Key is only to happy to ‘snuggle’ up to our American cuzzies.  Especially where a free trade agreement is on offer.  “Cold dead corpses for cold hard cash”, is one one of describing such a  mercenary position.

He has advocated a larger role in Iraq and is now promising the US active involvement  for “the next conflicts”.

Where will New Zealand troops end up? A bloody war in Iran, perhaps dragging Russia into the conflict? A proxy war in South East Asia or the Pacific, as a client of the US  vs a Chinese-backed antagonist? We’ve been down that road before in the 1950s, ’60s, and 70s.

Key seems to have a slavish, puppy-like eagerness to pander to Washington.

At the same time, his attitude to our fallen soldiers can only be described as  cavalier,

.

Full story

.

To be clear, John Key has never  served in the armed forces, nor has he ever been in a combatant in a warzone. He is that most dangerous type of  leader – someone who has little concept of the horrors of war, nor it’s lingering consequences, but is still able to make flippant committments for our military.

For Key to offer New Zealand military support to unknown, future conflicts in such a casual, reckless manner is a dangerous sign of a man out of touch.

In this area, his political opponant,  Labour-leader David Shearer, who has worked in combatzones and has witnessed first hand the devastastion and human tragedy  caused by war – is far more aware. Shearer is possibly the only man in Parliament with an  awareness of the human cost of war.

New Zealand voters should think carefully before voting for John Key again. They may inadvertantly be sending their children to war because of Key’s fawning desire to appease America.

Key has already said as much,

New Zealand warmly supports the United States rebalancing towards the Asia Pacific, and we welcome the opportunity to cooperate with the U.S. in the next conflicts.”

We have been warned.

.

*

.

Other blogs:

Fearfacts Exposed:   Key – “We welcome the opportunity to cooperate with the U.S. in the next conflicts”

Tumeke: Did John Key just enter us into a new American war?

36th Parallel: Press Releases: Remarks With New Zealand Prime Minister Key

Public Address: We … WHAT!?

.

.

= fs =

Advertisements
  1. Theodore
    4 September 2012 at 5:15 pm

    Kudos for having the cojones to retract and apologize Frank. Key doesn’t deserve it but your a lot fairer than he ever will be.

  2. Deborah Kean
    4 September 2012 at 6:22 pm

    That being said, he needs to improve his diction! 🙂
    Deb

  3. remo
    4 September 2012 at 6:59 pm

    It might be. It might not be. just read the state dept. transcript again and tell me how ‘contexts’ sits in the sentence? It makes no sense to say ‘…in the next contexts’….. to cooperate with the u.s. in the next contexts’ is not a phrase. makes not sense. Is not something anyone would necessarily say. I know he’s inaudible mostly, but sometimes he throws stuff about. John Key also told Paul Henry that ‘we were in Afghanistan because that’s where the people were who put those bombs in the buildings….” sometimes he speaks the truth.

  4. SpaceMonkey
    5 September 2012 at 1:10 pm

    Conflict/context aside, he still highlights his support for a “21st century free trade agreement” which is code for “me and my mega-corp mates are gonna make sure we fleece you for as much as we can until we can’t get away with it no more!!”

    Without us knowing what’s in that agreement, for all we know that could be a declaration of economic war on NZ society. Make the details of the TPPA public!

  1. 2 February 2019 at 8:01 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: