Archive for 14 November 2011

The Crafar Farms – Why the delay from the OIO?

14 November 2011 2 comments



Continued From

The second colonisation of New Zealand


To re-cap:

5 October 2009: Crafar Farms placed into receivership.

22 December 2010: Government  blocks  bid by Natural Dairy to buy the 16 Crafar farms on ‘good character’ grounds.

27 January 2011: KordaMentha accepts offer from Pengxin International Group Ltd to buy Crafar Farms.

18 April 2011: Shanghai Pengxin lodges application with the Overseas Investment Office (OIO) to buy the Crafar farms.

26 September 2011: Crafar farms receiver KordaMentha  rejects a conditional NZ$171.5 million offer for 16 central North Island dairy farms from a group led by controversial former merchant banker Michael Fay.


Since Shanghai Pengxin’s lodgement in April to apply for permission to buy the farms, the Overseas Investment Office (OIO) has not yet arrived at a decision.

This is extraordinary, as the OIO sets a target of 50 to 70 working-days to  process applications. It has now been seven months.

As the OIO states on it’s own website,


Estimated decision times

There is no statutory timeframe within which an application for consent must be decided. However applications generally fall into one of three categories according to complexity with category 3 being the most complex. These categories provide a guide for how long it may take for a decision to be made:

  • Category 1applications, where the OIO aims to make decisions within 30 working days from the date of registration. Examples include:(a) applications for consent to purchase significant business assets,
    (b) “sensitive land” decisions delegated to the OIO by Ministers that don’t fall into the categories below,
    (c) variations to existing consents
  • Category 2 applications where the OIO aims to make decisions within 50 working days from the date of registration.  Examples include:(a) “sensitive land” applications for consent requiring Ministerial consideration e.g. the purchase non-urban land greater than five hectares in size, where it includes or adjoins other sensitive land, such as conservation land, reserves etc
    (b) applications for exemptions.
  • Category 3applications, where the OIO aims to make decisions within 70 working days from the date of the registration.  Examples include:(a) applications to acquire an interest in fishing quota,
    (b) applications that involve special land being land that includes foreshore or the bed of a river or lake,
    (c) where the applicant intends to establish a purchasing programme such as a series of land acquisitions in a specific area for a specific project,
    (d) applications in respect of which a third party submission has been received by the Ministers or the OIO,
    (e) applications where the Ministers or the OIO have decided that consultation with third parties is appropriate in considering whether or not to grant consent.

Note that these targets apply to high quality, well prepared and analysed applications, and excludes the time where the OIO is waiting for the applicant to provide further information and the time for Ministers to consider and make decisions on relevant applications.



One cannot help but suspect that, because it is Election Year, that this government has delayed a final decision on Shanghai Pengxin’s application. Accordingly, I have written to Bill English, the Minister in charge of the OIO,


from:    [email]
date:    Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:27 PM
subject:    Crafar Farms


Shanghai Pengxins lodged an application with the Overseas Investment Office (OIO) on or around 18 April, to buy the Crafar portfolio after Natural Dairy’s application was rejected.

Normally, applications take up to 50 to 70 working days to process.

It has now been seven months since Shanghai Pengxins lodged it’s  application.

As the Minister responsible for the OIO, is there a reason as to why Shanghai Pengxins’ application has not yet received a decision? Or is the decision being deferred until after the election because of it’s sensitivity?

Information on this matter would be appreciated.

-Frank Macskasy

from:    B English (MIN)
to:    [email]
date:    Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:19 PM
subject:    RE: Crafar Farms

Dear Frank Macskasy

On behalf of the Hon Bill English, Minister of Finance thank you for your recent email regarding Crafar Farms.  Your letter has been passed on to the Minister for his information.  
As the issues you have raised, however, fall within the portfolio responsibilities of Hon Kate Wilkinson, I have also referred a copy of your letter to her for consideration and reply.

Kind regards

Katy Greco-Ainslie
Private Secretary
Hon Bill English
Deputy Prime Minister
Minister of Finance
Minister for Infrastructure

from:    [email]
to:    “B English (MIN)” <>
date:    Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:46 PM
subject:    Re: Crafar Farms

Kia Ora Katy,

I am unsure why you have placed this matter before Ms Wilkinson. Her portfolios are,

    * Minister of Conservation
    * Minister of Labour
    * Minister for Food Safety
    * Associate Minister of Immigration

The Overseas Investment Office is responsible to the Minister of  Finance, Bill English, or Minister for Land Information, Maurice Williamson, as per the official LINZ website, and Parliamentary websites:

Considering that the issue of the sale of Crafar farms may fall into “sensitive lands” category, this matter would most likely fall under Bill English’s jurisdiction.

-Frank Macskasy


Uh oh…  it appears that the Minister’s office has just given me the “brush off”!

from    B English (MIN)
to    [email]
date    Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:46 PM
subject    Thank you for your email.

On behalf of Hon Bill English, thank you for your email.  

Please be assured that all correspondence is read and noted by this office. Where the Minister has portfolio or MP for Clutha-Southland responsibilities for the issues raised, a response will be sent to you in due course.  

While the Minister considers all correspondence to be important, if your email falls outside of his portfolio or electorate responsibilities, or expresses a personal view, then your opinion will be noted and your response may be tranferred to another office or there may be no further response to you.

Thank you for taking the time to write.  

Authorised by B English, 15 Main Street, Gore.

It is my guess that this government has deliberately stalled Shanghai Pengxin’s application to to OIO, and that consent will not be given until after the Election. National understands that the issue of farm sales to overseas investors is not well-liked by the New Zealand public and that on this issue alone, they could lose the election.

I do not expect a reply from Bill English.

I do expect that permission  for the Crafar Farms to be sold to Shanghai Pengxin will be given next year.

This is the government that New Zealanders expect to re-elect…



The game’s afoot, Watson!

14 November 2011 3 comments



Continued From

What are you hiding, Mr Key?


More than ever, people’s curiosity is mounting over just what was recorded in the “Teapot Tapes“. John Key’s assurances that the tapes hold nothing of interest seem to be of dubious value,  since he has now referred the matter to the Police for investigation.

By referring the matter to the Police, it’s a rather ham-fisted attempt to close down the issue. Fat chance. (Although it now gives John Key the standard excuse,  “I-can’t-comment-on-an-ongoing-police-investigation”,  when journalists press him on this issue. Clever lad, John.)

Things have become more interesting…

The ‘Herald on Sunday’ advised the public that they had destroyed their copy of the tape… but not before passing a copy on to another media outlet – TV3!

Today, TV3 ran this story on the “Teapot Tapes”,


[Click on image]


TV3 have been warned by Police not to air the tape or publish a transcript.

However, that didn’t stop TV3 reporter, Rebecca Wright from asking John Banks a series of questions;

“1. Did you talk about Don Brash at all?

2. Is there going to be a restructure of the ACT party after the election?

3. Do you think that people who are going to vote for you have a right to know if Don Brash isn’t going to be there after the election?”

Which kind of gives away what was discussed by the Two Johns: ACT’s leadership.

Judging by John Key’s reticence in releasing the “Teapot Tapes”, he said something that – at the very least – might be highly embarressing to him, publicly.

Little wonder that Brash, Banks, Key, and ACT/National supporters don’t want the contents of these tapes made public.

It makes them look like utter wallies.



National’s new slogan Drill it! Mine It! Sell it!

Political Activists


Seven hundred National Party billboards across the country were made ‘more honest’ by progressive activists in a co-ordinated operation overnight.



The activists fixed new slogans over the billboards which said: “The Rich Deserve More” and “Drill it! Mine It! Sell it!”

An un-named organiser of the operation said National needed to be more honest in its campaign, and the new slogans reflect the truth which National is neglecting to mention.

“We decided to help the National Party spell out its plans in ways that every voter can understand. They believe in increasing the deficit by giving the rich tax cuts, then selling state assets to reduce the deficit they just created, drilling oil wells along our coastline, and digging up forests for low grade coal. We want to make sure voters know that.

“Over 50 people have been improving National’s billboards in Auckland, Wellington, Gisborne, Whakatane, Napier, Hastings, New Plymouth, Palmerston North, Kapiti Coast, Nelson, Marlborough, Motueka, Golden Bay, Christchurch and Dunedin.

“We hope voters like the more truthful billboards and hope that some National supporters will want to leave them as they are.

“The Prime Minister believes in transparency. He says he doesn’t lie. We’re happy to help.”



Copyright (c) Scoop Media

Thanks to  Fearfactsexposed Blog for bringing this to my attention.