National caught out over Solid Energy – changes story on coal prices, debt, and other matters
When Solid Energy’s financial crisis became public on 21 February 2013, Bill English, Tony Ryall, and John Key were quick to apportion blame. Their high-paid (by the taxpayer) media strategists had done their dirty work.
- Solid Energy mis-reading trends in coal prices
- The previous Labour government
- The Board and management of Solid Energy
- The Global Financial Crisis
- Mrs Teagle, the tea-lady
Everyone was to blame. National’s hands were clean. The world is a bad place.
So, let’s go through the points above.
1. Solid Energy mis-reading trends in coal prices
One of National’s constant lines - in an attempt to smear Solid Energy’s Board as incompetant – was the SOE’s inability to “read trends in world prices for coal”.
As Dear Leader, John Key said on 25 February,
Asked at his post-cabinet press conference why Solid Energy was in such dire straits, he said its directors grossly over-estimated what they thought coal would be worth.
“They got it completely and utterly wrong, and up to the middle of 2012 they still rejected the international view of where coal was likely to go,” he said.
On 21 February, Little Leader, Bill English said,
“World coal prices have dropped significantly which has contributed to the deteriorating financial position that Solid Energy is in now.
“These discussions are required because the position of the state-owned enterprise has continued to deteriorate despite the restructuring that has already taken place,” Mr English says.
And as Baby Leader, Tony Ryall also said on 21 February,
State-owned Enterprises Minister Tony Ryall said a number of factors had weighed against the company, in particular world coal prices dropping by 40 per cent.
“It is facing very serious financial challenges,” Ryall said.
So the narrative being spread by senior National ministers was that Solid Energy was incompetant and couldn’t understand world coal price trends.
Which, for a company that lives, breathes, and farts coal seemed… unlikely.
#1 – Rebutted
But then, on 13 March, Bill English was reported on Radio New Zealand with this statement,
But Finance Minister Bill English says it wasn’t clear that coal prices were declining, and the Government can’t be held responsible for how much debt Solid Energy eventually took on.
Okay… so despite Key, English, and Ryall insisting that Solid Energy had mis-read trends in global coal prices, he is now saying that “it wasn’t clear that coal prices were declining”?!
Well, I’m glad that’s been cleared up.
After all, it’s not like National was initially claiming that world coal prices [were] dropping by 40 per cent to make Solid Energy’s board look bad – and then suggested it wasn’t clear that coal prices were declining for National to save their own arses.
That would be… contradictory.
2. The previous Labour government
National has blamed the previous Labour government for everything, from the decline of the British Empire, to the sinking of the Titanic. (And trying to pin both World Wars on Labour – but that’s a work-in-progress.)
On 26 February, Key said,
“They can’t wash their hands of the fact that from 2003 on, they were intimately involved with the plans that that company had,” Mr Key said.
On 13 March, English said,
At the time, it was not clear that coal prices were declining. In fact, the best advice from the company—with which the Government ended up disagreeing—was that coal prices would continue to rise. But, as I said, that decision was made in the context of the mess that the previous Labour Government left with the State-owned enterprises.
Ah, the inhumanity of it all… The dastardly tentacles of a previous government, from four years ago, reaches into the present day to thwart National’s good works. It’s amazing that with such power, that Labouir ever managed to lose two elections in succession, from 2008…
One has to wonder though… is National really so powerless? If so, why are they in government?
#2 – Rebutted
In a rather strange moment of open honesty, Tony Ryall had this to say about Labour’s administration of SOEs, on 27 February,
Hon TONY RYALL: No, I am not going to launch some sort of independent investigation into the governance of Solid Energy. The governance of Solid Energy, much of which was appointed under the previous Labour Government, was running that company and it was doing very well up until 2011. We had the scoping study. It identified a number of issues. And I agree with Trevor Mallard: the collapse of world coal prices is a most significant factor in this matter.
And a few days later, on 2 March of this year, Key let slip,
”On the face of it, at least what it had was rising profits. It had a situation where its valuation was going up, it had bankers lending it money, and it had an investment stream that had been set in place by the previous Labour Government,” Mr Key told BusinessDay.
A look at the profits and dividends paid during Labour’s administration bear out their prudent management of SOEs. And confirmed by Tony Ryall and John Key.
In Labour’s entire eight years, not one single SOE suffered a financial collapse of the magnitude of Solid Energy – and Cullen was still posting surpluses, year after year. And paying down government debt. And finding time to play with his grandkids.
The Nats are in office for four years – and they lose a SOE on their watch?
How does that work?
Especially when, as Adam Bennett reported in the Herald on 13 March,
Mr Shearer later said Solid Energy had responded to the Government’s call, “returning $130 million over four years, including $30 million in late 2011 by which time coal prices had further declined and the company was in financial distress“.
He also pointed to the company’s increase in borrowing over that period, rising from $13 million in 2009 to $191 million the following year and $313 million by 2012.
By contrast, the previous Labour government, took only $64.4 million as a dividend to the to the Crown – over an eight year period. (See: Government defends Solid Energy payouts)
Which still baffles me as to why New Zealanders still have this misconception that National are “prudent fiscal managers” of the economy.
Personally, I wouldn’t let the buggers run a sausage sizzle outside Pak’n'Save.
3. The Board and management of Solid Energy
National’s culture of blaming others for their own mistakes is slowly but surely building in the public consciousness. (See previous blogposts: Taking responsibility, National-style, Dear Leader Key blames everyone else for Solid Energy’s financial crisis) It has become de rigueur for National to immediately seek out, and blame others, for one of their cock-ups.
And when one minister – Kate Wilkinson – resigned immediatly upon the release of the report from the Royal Commission on the Pike River Coal Mine Tragedy, it was seen for what it was; tokenism. And a strategic attempt to close down (or minimise) media scrutiny of National’s de-regulation in the 1990s, which led inevitably to a culture of poor safety in our mining industry.
Practically every public comment by National has directly, indirectly, or in a covert fashion, attempted to sheet blame for Solid Energy’s financial crash on it’s Board and CEO, Don Elder.
Key even suggested – po-faced – that the SOE was practically out of control. On 25 February, Dear Leader stated,
While the New Zealand government was unwilling to back Solid Energy in that role, it appears to have been powerless to prevent the company from taking what Key described as “baby steps” towards such a future.
“The company did have the right to draw down debt and make investments without shareholder authority” up to a certain level, Mr Key says.
So, can someone remind me again – what, precisely, is the role of the Minister for State Owned Enterprises?
#3 – Rebutted
The above was nothing less than an attempt at total abdication of responsibility by Key and his Ministers. As an incredibly insightful Dominion Post editorial of 2 March stated,
There are always excuses when a company starts to fail. John Key’s explanation for the trouble at Solid Energy, however – he blamed the Labour government – was pitiful.
It was Trevor Mallard’s fault, apparently, for encouraging SOEs to spread their wings and fly. That was in 2007 or 2008.
This won’t do, and not just because Mr Key’s Government has been in power for more than four years. His argument also contradicts itself. A Labour government was seemingly omnipotent and could have its way with the state-owned coal company. But National had no such power.
The Government certainly said no when Solid Energy asked for a billion dollars to turn itself into a super-company along the lines of Petrobras, the Brazilian giant. Mr Key says it had grave doubts about the company’s expansion plans. His political opponents point out that he and Bill English had publicly backed Solid Energy’s big plans for lignite conversion and briquetting.
So what was really going on? Mr Key says the company didn’t require the Government’s approval for the investments. Nor did the Government have a good reason to sack the board, as it could have done under the SOE legislation. So: nothing to see here, apparently.
If all these excuses were valid, it would be hard to know how any government could be held to account for what its state-owned companies were doing. Mr Key’s Government cannot get off so lightly. Nor can his officials. It is unclear just what kind of “monitoring” Treasury was doing, but it obviously wasn’t effective.
And then, on 13 March – the bombshell,
So now we’re getting at the answers.
Now we’re starting to build up a clearer picture as to not how Solid Energy got into debt – but why.
As with most things, the anwer is simple.
National needed cash to balance it’s books by 2014/15. Not content to flog off state assets to raise x-billion dollars, it used Solid Energy as as cash cow, to extract maximum dividends.
Just as Brierleys extracted maximum dividends from Air New Zealand in 2001, stripping the airline of it’s cash reserves in the process and bankrupting it. (see previous blogpost: A Clear Warning to Investors in SOEs)
More importantly, it used Solid Energy as a front to borrow.
If a government borrows cash, it shows up on their balance books as a liability.
If a SOE borrows cash; then pays it to a government as a “dividend”, it shows up on the books as a profit.
That was why National was forcing Solid Energy to borrow hundreds of millions of dollars and then demanding it to be paid into government coffers as a “dividend”.
My immediate thoughts on this are,
- All three ministers – Key, English, and Ryall – should appear before the Commerce Select Committee to answer questions. To this blogger, there appears to be serious implications of questionable behaviour by National Ministers and their dealings with Solid Energy.
- There is more to come out on this isssue, such as why Solid Energy’s Board allowed this cash-stripping by National Ministers to be carried out.
- And this is the most important: I think every New Zealander who is considering investing in Mighty River Power – and other SOE shares – should look very carefully at their books. The question has to be asked; have National Ministers done the same thing to other SOES? Are they also heavily “geared” (borrowed against assets) and highly vulnerable to market downturns?
- The auditor-general, or some other forensic accounting firm, should immediatly be called in to to assess the books of all SOES.
At this point in time, I wouldn’t touch a single share of any SOE, with bio-hazard gloves.
They may be financially toxic.
Fairfax media: Debt-laden Solid Energy talking to banks (21 Feb 2013)
Building a Brighter Future: Bill English & Tony Ryall – Statement on Solid Energy (21 Feb 2013)
Scoop: Govt blocked grandiose Solid Energy plans in 2009 (25 February 2013)
MSN News: Solid Energy got coal price wrong: Key (25 February 2013)
TV3: Govt, Labour squabble over Solid Energy (26 Feb 2013)
Otago Daily Times: Solid Energy bail-out cost likely to rise (2 March 2013)
Dominion Post: Editorial: Solid Energy excuses fuel anger (2 March 2013)
Southland Times: Government defends Solid Energy payouts (12 March 2013)
Radio NZ: Labour says Govt forced Solid Energy to borrow more (13 March 2013)
NZ Herald: Govt accused of milking Solid Energy for dividends (13 March 2013)
Parliament: Questions for oral answer: Ministers—Confidence (13 March 2013)
Parliament: Parliament Questions and Answers (13 March 2013)
= fs =