Priorities – according to the ‘gospel’ of Colin Craig
This came through our letter box today,
It came with other advertising junk-mail (despite the “No Junk Mail” clearly visible on our letterbox), so it was obviously delivered by a commercial leafletting company and not by Party volunteers.
The front page instantly commanded attention with the wording, “Do you agree?” followed by “Find out what 34% of people surveyed didn’t know!”.
What was taxing the mind of Conservative Party leader, Colin Craig?
What pressing issues were dominating his thoughts?
Was it the loss of 40,000 jobs in the last four years as the manufacturing and export sector are hit by a higher and higher New Zealand Dollar?
Was it 85,000+ young people not in employment, education of training?
Was it the 175,000 unemployed?
Was it 250,000 children living in poverty?
Was it National’s intention to partially flog of five state assets, worth billions to taxpayers in this country?
Time to open the pamplet and find out…
Craig has spent tens of thousands of dollars on a piece of colour-printed, glossy paper to complain about gays and lesbians being given marriage equality???
Where is this man’s head at?
Craig’s comments are not even logical.
For one thing, he states that “this is not about equality”.
It is all about equality.
He even admits it,
“The Civil Union Act in fact copied the operating provisions of the Marriage Act so both have the same legal equality (except deliberately in the case of adoption and parentingof children.)”
Oh… so there’s ‘equality’ – except in cases of blah, blah, blah.
Um… *scratches head*… then it’s not equality, is it, Mr Craig?
Saying that “…both have the same legal equality except deliberately in the case of adoption and parentingof children” is like saying that Blacks in the Southern States of America were equal to Whites in the 1950s… except for blah, blah, blah…
Or Blacks in South Africa were equal to Whites in South Africa during the Apartheid Era. Oh, except that Blacks couldn’t vote. And weren’t allowed on certain beaches. Or blah, blah, blah…
Message to Mr Craig’s remaining functioning brain cells: you can’t have equality where exceptions undermine that equality. Because then it’s not equality. It’s something else.
Which, by the way, is one of the strange points that Craig attempts to make in his weirdly surreal propaganda.
On the page below, Craig states,
“This country has become a dangerous place to be a child. If nothing else we must fight and speak for the children. We must seek their absolute best [?] and give of ourselves to protect them, blah, blah, blah…”
So what is it that Colin Craig is trying to say? That two people in love and wanting to marry is going to make “this country … a dangerous place to be a child “?! How the f**k does that work?
Poverty is dangerous for children.
Lack of nutritious food is dangerous for children.
Damp houses are dangerous for children.
Drugs and alcohol dangerous for children.
Abusive households are dangerous for children.
Government policies to do with low wages; poor housing; and lack of opportunities is dangerous for children.
But two people in love wanting to get married?
The workings of Colin Craig’s mind is even more unfathomable than I had previously believed possible. No wonder John Key rolled his eyes and muttered “it’s going to be a long two and a half years” when presented with the possibility of the bizarre Conservative Party as a potential coalition partner (see: John Key’s midterm blues?).
Reading this trash, I laughed even harder when I spotted another incongruency at Craig’s disjointed thinking.
On page 2,
“… Mr Key is now ignoring his electorate and says he will support same-sex marriage and adoption. He will not be voting as directed by his electorate. This is simply wrong. If Mr Key will not vote on behalf of his electorate, then who will? He is their paid representative; he is the one person sent to Parliament on their behalf.“
On page 3,
“Good leadership requires listening to both sides of the debate and then deciding what is best for our country.”
So on the one hand… Craig sez that it “is simply wrong” for Key not to vote according to his electorate (not that we actually know what his electorate “thinks”.
But on the other hand, “good leadership ” is about “ listening to both sides of the debate and then deciding what is best for our country“.
Hmmm, a bit contradictory there, Colin. You should proof-read your writing a bit more closely.
“I believe the evidence shows that it is ideal that an adopted child grow up with a great Mum and Dad…”
Two things bother me about that blanket statement.
1. If “evidence” exists to support Mr Craig’s prehistoric views, then it’s not a matter of “belief”. Evidence either exists to support his views. Or it does not.
Belief does not enter into it.
2. Unfortunately, the evidence that does exist points to one inescapable fact; many homes in our country are dangerous places for young children.
Too many have been neglected, severely injured, beaten, sexually abused, traumatised, and killed – at the hands of their “Dads” and too often, their “Mums”.
Heterosexual, ‘nuclear’-style families.
They are killing the children of our nation.
And not a gay parent to be seen anywhere.
= fs =
For a better New Zealand…
~ Cleaner rivers
~ No deep-sea oil drilling
~ Less on Roads - more on Rail
~ A Living wage at $18.40/hr
~ Marriage equality - Yay! Got that one!
~ Strong, effective Unions
~ No secret free-trade deals
~ Breakfast/lunches in our schools
~ Introducing Civics into our school curriculum
~ Cut back on the liquor industry
~ A fairer, progressive tax system
~ Fully funded, free healthcare
~ Ditto for education, including Tertiary
~ Fund Pharmac for Pompe's Disease medication & other 'orphan' drugs
~ No state asset sales!
~ Rebuild public TV broadcasting!
~ Keeping farms in local ownership
~ Reduce poverty, like we reduced the toll for road-fatalities
~ Jobs, Jobs, Jobs!
~ Being nice to each other
- Letter to the editor – when a Terror Alert really was needed!
- Housing; broken promises, families in cars, and ideological idiocy (Part Rua)
- Letter to the editor – John Key should lead by example
- Letter to the editor – Daleks, Kim Jong-un, Elvis, and Roger Douglas
- Housing; broken promises, families in cars, and ideological idiocy (Part Tahi)
- 2014 – Ongoing jobless tally
- Letter to the editor – The New Vietnam; who is first?
- Letter to the editor – The martians are coming! The martians are coming!
- 2014 Election – Post-mortem Up-date
- Letter to the editor – From a warm beach in Hawaii, With Love
- Letter to the editor – Key’s one true portfolio remains…
- Letter to the Editor – An own-goal from a particularly stupid National Supporter
- A Study in Party Stability
- Deep thought vs Deep prejudice
- Letter to the editor – “An Alarmed World” according to The Listener
- No More. The Left Falls.
- Election 2014; A Post-mortem; a Wake; and one helluva hang-over
- Letter to the editor: the culling of Cunliffe (v2)
- Letter to the editor: the culling of Cunliffe
- The Donghua Liu Affair – The Players Revealed
- She saw John Key on TV and decided to vote!
- Voting turnout affected by bad weather?
- Teflon Man No More
- It’s official: ACT’s Jamie Whyte is several-sandwiches-and-a-salad short of a picnic
- Letters to the Editor – Spies, Lies, Five Eyes, and other matters on a Sunday afternoon
- Frank Macskasy: Who I voted for…
- September 15 RNZ interviews – and then the Moment of Truth
- Katherine Rich – resign!
- It’s time for Key to go!
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- 343,160 hits