This will end in tears…
Union upset at new meat inspection rules
Newstalk ZB May 19, 2012, 10:17 am
The union for public servants is unhappy at new rules allowing meat companies to inspect their own produce.
The Ministry for Primary Industries is going ahead with the scheme, after consulting our main trading partners.
Until now, meat inspections have been done by government officials employed by AsureQuality.
The PSA’s Richard Wagstaff says inspectors are telling him there’s already pressure on them to speed the process up.
“They think that if they didn’t have an independent warrant and didn’t work for a separate company, the pressure that would come to bear on them would be impossible to resist.”
The union is also worried about the inspectors’ jobs.
Where have we heard this before…?
As it happened: Pike River Mine Inquiry day four
Published: 8:35AM Thursday July 14, 2011 Source: ONE News
“12.47pm: A letter written to the Ministry of Energy by [Harry Bell - Former Chief Inspector of coal mines ] Bell in 1997 is bought up as evidence. He confirms that he still holds the views expressed in the letter. He wanted the Mining Inspection Group (MIG) to stay within the Ministry Of Commerce. Marine and aviation industries had been left out of the new Occupational Safety and Health regulations, and he believe that mining also should be left out. “Mining is an entirely different industry to shops and factories.” That letter came at the end of the transition process, but Bell says it was a view that had been expressed from the beginning. “All the inspectors did, but nobody listened, they had already made their minds ups.”
12.45pm: Bell says that mines cannot be audited ‘on paper’ – mines need to be physcally inspected. He says that a lack of regular inspections was a “Recipe for disaster”.
12.42pm: Bell says he has had concerns about the closure of dedicated mine training through polytechs with regular standards set by the Board of Examiners, made up by experienced miners. He has concerns that students are not orally examined, with students not checked that they understand any work that they have completed.
12.39 pm: He says that under the new regime there was only one inspection in one year at a mine he managed. “A reactive response is not appropriate for the underground coal mine industry.”
12.34 pm: Bell says, “The Pike River plans should never have been approved, and in my opinion would not have been approved in the prior regulatory environment.” He says he believes the Pike River disaster can be attributed in some part to human error, lack of inspector experience, and lack of inspections.
12.32 pm: He says that since 1993 calibre of the OSH (Department of Labour) inspectors has slipped dramatically, and that management and the miners are left to self regulate. Today the inspectors are not experienced with gassy mines or the management of roles. He says a factor in this was that salaries were cut – experienced miners would no longer take the role.“
In 2010, New Zealand’s meat industry earned $5.7 billion in exports.
Our entire reputation as a reliable, dependable, and safe source of food has been based not just on our relatively clean and mostly unpolluted environment – but also on our strict inspection regime. Up until now, meat inspectors have been independent and impartial, giving fear nor favour to no one.
History has shown that where an industry is left to self-regulate, that problems will occur.
Self-regulation is not a bright idea. In fact, it stinks like meat offal left out in the noon-day sun.
Next, the multi-billion dollar leaking-homes scandal,
“ I think that is important that we accept that we have a Government—not just this Government—and a whole lot of people who have the mantra of deregulation and self-regulation. We are being told, everywhere we turn, that self-regulation and deregulation will work. We do not need all this onerous regulation. This leaky home disaster is an abject lesson in what happens in the huge cost of deregulation.
What did this 1991 Act do?
The aim of it was to encourage competition in the market, to boost the building industry, to reduce building costs, and to save money. Everyone whipped themselves into a fervour about the wonderful things that would happen with the passage of the Building Act and deregulation. They wiped out all the previous regulations and controls, they loosened councils’ inspection procedures, and they allowed the introduction of private council inspectors, so that there would be competition with council inspectors. “
” It does interest me that the building sector has, indeed, self regulated since 1821 (when New Zealand’s first house was built — Kemp House — nearly 200 years ago).
Self regulation is where an industry has Codes of Practice — eg, training standards, self monitoring and/or voluntary accreditation systems — like the Registered Master Builders Federation which imposes entry standards and criteria upon membership.
Yet, it is only now that the Government has deemed it necessary to regulate the building occupation, and then, only the residential sector due primarily to the leaky homes saga…
… Mind you, we don’t start being “regulated” until March 1, 2012, so we are, indeed, still self-regulating. “
Self-regulation in a commercial environment is not a good idea. There are simply too many pressures brought to bear on Inspectors, and eventually a culture of short-cuts and turning a blind eye develops.
As usual, this daft proposal emanates from National – a party in power that penny-pinches and cost-cuts, and exposes New Zealand’s economy to dire risks.
Unfortunately, as with the ministerial architects of the 1991 Building Act “reforms”, those who legislate; de-regulate; and self-regulate are not the ones who will be held to account when something goes horribly wrong.
As usual, the politicians responsible will not shoulder responsibility – and it will be the taxpayer who foots the bill to fix whatever mess eventuates.
Self-regulation in the meat industry. Not a good idea. In fact, it’s a dumb idea.
This will end in tears. Again.
= fs =