How Paula Bennett and National are wasting our taxdollars
National today announced that “there will be an upfront investment in welfare reform of $520 million over four years to support more beneficiaries into work“.
What, precisely, does that mean; “to support more beneficiaries into work“?!
A NZ Herald report attempted to provide some answers,
“The funding package includes $80 million for early childhood education and childcare assistance payments, $55.1 million for 155 Work and Income staff who will be dedicated to support people back into work, and $148.8 million for youth services.
Ms Bennett said the $287.5 million included $81.5 million of additional funding, but the remainder would come from “reprioritised” funding from within Social Development.” – Source
“The Government’s welfare changes require significant up-front financial support. We’ve made a commitment to provide that investment to ensure fewer people are on welfare long term.” – Ibid
Extra funding for childcare is always a good thing (though with National, expect the obligatory ‘fish hooks’ – National gives nothing away without a hidden barb somewhere in the deal), and this Blogger congratulates such a move.
But where this Blogger has serious concerns is the euphemism employed by Bennett, Key, and other well-paid right wing politicians, when they claim that ‘reforms’ “will be to support people back into work “.
National’s idea of what constitutes “support” is often at stark variance with how others might define support.
The all important issue is; are there enough jobs in the country for beneficiaries to go into? This is no empty question, as Paula Bennett herself admitted last Sunday (29 April), on TVNZ’s Q+A,
Can I ask you about work, though? Do you think that there is a job out there for all these young people who really really want a job? Is there a job out there for young people who really want a job?
No. There’s not a job for everyone that would want one right now, or else we wouldn’t have the unemployment figures that we do.
If, as Bennett admits, there there’s not a job for everyone that would want one right now, then what is the purpose of spending over half a billion dollars of taxpayers’ money on “welfare reforms”?
Next question: why not invest that $520 million in job creation progammes? We have a critical housing shortage; growing poverty; and unemployment is rising again – why not invest in job creation?
Why invest in welfare “reforms” – when welfare ain’t broke? Welfare is working precisely as intended and is keeping people alive, fed, and housed at a time of economic recession/stagnation.
As Bennett admitted on Q+A, it is the employment market that is broken and there are not enough jobs for those who want one. It’s as simple as that: not enough jobs.
Which means that John Key and Paula Bennett are wasting $520 million of our taxes on a pointless, futile exercise.
How many new jobs will welfare “reforms” create? Not a single one.
This may give ‘jollies’ to National Party groupies; assorted right wing zealots; anti-beneficiary bigots; and low-information voters – but in the end this waste of resources and obvious exercise in beneficiary victimisation will be as useful as seeking a meaningful relationship by scouring internet porn-sites.
I don’t mind if right wingers indulge in a mindless, political, circle-jerk. But not when we, the taxpayer, have to pay for it.
Our Dear Leader, the Prime Minister of New Zealand enjoyed the benefits of a modern welfare society that protects those in need;
- 1967: Key’s mother would have had access to the widow’s benefit when her husband passed away,
- The Key family lived in a low-rent, State House, in Christchurch
- 1979-81: Key received a free tertiary education at Canterbury University (BCom in accounting)
- Key would most likely have received a student allowance during his tertiary studies
- Key received an extra $5,096 p/a from the April 2009 taxcuts
- Key recieved an extra $7,100 p/a from the October 2010 taxcuts
Paula Bennett, Minister of Welfare,
- Paula Bennet was a solo-mother, at age 17
- Just two years later, she used a Housing Corporation loan to buy a $56,000 house in Taupo.
- All of this while on the domestic purposes benefit.
- Paula Bennet was a recipient of the Training Incentive Allowance (a WINZ benefit)
- Paula Bennet obtained her degree at Massey University, through the TIA – a taxpayer-funded benefit
= fs =
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
For a better New Zealand…
~ Cleaner rivers
~ No deep-sea oil drilling
~ Less on Roads - more on Rail
~ Minimum wage @ $15 p/hr
~ Marriage equality
~ Strong, effective Unions
~ No secret free-trade deals
~ Breakfast/lunches in our schools
~ Introducing Civics into our school curriculum
~ Cut back on the liquor industry
~ A fairer, progressive tax system
~ Fully funded, free healthcare
~ Ditto for education, including Tertiary
~ Fund Pharmac for Pompe's Disease medication & other 'orphan' drugs
~ No state asset sales!
~ Rebuild public TV broadcasting!
~ Keeping farms in local ownership
~ Reduce poverty, like we reduced the toll for road-fatalities
~ Jobs, Jobs, Jobs!
~ Being nice to each other
- Mining, Drilling, Arresting, Imprisoning – Simon Bridges
- A letter to the Dominion Post on the GCSB…
- The GCSB law – vague or crystal clear?
- Budget 2013: Child poverty, food in schools, and National’s response
- Corporate Welfare under National
- Budget 2013: petrol taxes
- Budget 2013: Student debt, politicians, and “social contracts”
- The Right has a new media voice
- Budget 2013: State Housing and the War on Poor
- Budget 2013: Radio NZ and politicians
- Budget 2013: Suffer the little children… to starve
- Brain fades and balls ups
- Citizen A: With Martyn Bradbury, Keith Locke & Matthew Hooton On Budget + Key’s Deal + Gilmore Wrap
- Budget 2013: How NOT to deal with Student loan defaulters
- Meridian Power?
- *** UP-DATED! *** NEWSFLASH!!! *** On TV3′s Campbell Live Wednesday night!
- John Key advocates theft by banks?
- On child poverty, to the Sunday Star Times…
- National on Child Poverty?!
- ***Breaking News*** Judith Collins issues decision on MMP Review!
- Binding future governments – a question.
- Skycity: National prostitutes New Zealand yet again
- Why a Four Year Parliamentary Term is not a Good Idea
- National Party Corporate welfare vs real welfare
- The NZ Taliban – quietly safeguarding our morals