You’ll have a free market – even if it KILLS you!
This is perhaps the clearest example of neo-liberalism forcing itself on nations that cannot resist the influence of western corporatism – even when it places people at risk from unsafe products,
Whilst WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy said that Samoa’s enytry into the WTO would “enable Samoa to participate more fully in the global economy and will provide the country with a predictable and stable basis for growth and development” - Otago Medical School Associate Professor, Nick Wilson, was less than enthusiastic,
“From a public health perspective the decision to allow turkey tails … will fuel the epidemics of obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease that are hitting Pacific Island nations.“
Mean, a spokesperson for our Trade Minister, Tim Groser, supported lifting the ban.
“Trade bans on selected items are unlikely to be effective in addressing obesity and health issues.”
Really?! So if a government allows an unhealthy product to be put on their supermarket shelves; and is then consumed by members of the public – Tim Groser is saying that’s ok?
That sounds like a fairly good rationale for legalising and selling heroin.
After all, it could easily be said that banning heroin is “unlikely to be effective in addressing …health issues.”
Just what the South Pacific needs: more unhealthy food by-products distributed and sold cheaply, and which will ultimately result in yet more Pacifica peoples dying from obesity-related diseases.
Are we in the West proud of ourselves, yet?
The greatest irony is that, in the 1970s, New Zealand fought a diplomatic war against the French to stop atomic weapons-testing in the South Pacific, because of fears that radiation would harm the environment and ourselves.
What is even more obscene is that US corporate interests are quite open in their campaign to market unhealthy, destructive foods to low-income, under-developed societies,
“The USA Poultry and Egg Export Council welcomed the end on the ban, telling Bloomberg that it was the “consumers’ right to determine what foods they wish to consume, not the government’s.“
Under the guise of “free choice”, corporate interests will peddle their cheap, toxic, foodstuffs to Pacifican people – and will reap profits, whilst local governments pick up the social costs of dealing with diabetes, heart disease, and other obesity-related diseases.
Surely by now, we in the West must be revelling in pride at this accomplishment.
This is the raw, naked face of unfettered free market capitalism that is not bound by morality, nor concerns for human welfare. This is profit-making without due regard to consequences.
And this time, the blood of Pacificans are on our hands as well; “Fiji banned mutton flap imports in 2000 and New Zealand responded by threatening to refer the issue to the World Trade Organisation (WTO). New Zealand later withdrew plans to approach the WTO and the ban still stands (as of March 2009)”,
I wonder how we might feel if another nation exported unhealthy products into our country – perhaps targetted at our young people – and we were powerless to stop it?
How would we feel, for example, if all restrictions on alcohol and tobacco products had to be removed at WTO insistence – because companies that manufactured those products were unhappy that their profits were being undermined?
We’d be pretty pissed, I’d guess.
But it’s ok if we do it to another country; to our neighbours in the Pacific?
“WTO critics claim the Washington based International Food and Beverage Alliance, formed by Kraft, Coca-Cola and General Mills, is behind the pressure to end food type bans.
“This is not true,” spokeswoman Jane Reid said.
“(The Alliance) has had no involvement whatsoever in this issue.”“
It is high time that New Zealand led by example and halted the sale of unhealthy meat by-products to our Pacific neighbours. Otherwise we are practically conducting war-by-poor-nutrition against the peoples of the Pacific.
It is time that New Zealand led an international campaign in the WTO against rules that allow toxic foods to be sold without restraint.
International trade rules that favour corporate “rights” and unfettered trade are anathema to the values that we hold dear. In the final analysis, governments are responsible for the safety and wellbeing of their peoples – not to corporations and their profits.
Perhaps Tim Grosser; the National Government; the WTO; the International Food and Beverage Alliance; the USA Poultry and Egg Export Council; et al; would care to dine out on mutton flaps and turkey tails for a few years?
I guess not.
After all, they can all afford proper, nutritious food.