Military ‘spin-doctoring’ – the media catch-up
It seems somewhat odd then, that Neil Reid, has written on this very same issue, in the Sunday Star Times, stating, “Documents obtained by the Sunday Star-Times show the department – covering Army, Air Force and Navy – spent more than $2.7 million in the past financial year on public relations and communications. “
This story has at least three componants to it;
1. PR spend.
Last time I looked, the job of the military was to carry out such actions as determined by the Government-of-the-Day. The military is tasked with certain missions, to achieve certain objectives, as laid down by the Minister of Defence, and the Government. In effect, the politicians tell the soldier boys (and girls) to go to “Spot X” and do what soldiers do best; point guns at other people.
As such, it boggles the mind as to what on Earth the NZDF would need to spend $20 million tax-dollars of Public Relations on?!?!
Spending $20 million on tanks, guns, ammunition, radios, tents, medical equipment, planes, trucks – I think we get that. Military gear doesn’t come cheap – not since we moved away from clubs and pointy-sticks.
But spending that kind of money on PR? That just makes no sense whatsoever.
Unless the NZDF were doing something overseas that the Government(s)-of-the-Day were not being totally candid with us, the New Zealand public?
PR is basically ‘spin’ – putting the best possible image of an unpleasant situation. Another word that might be appropriate is propaganda. Authoritarian regimes (such as Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, Maoist China, et al) are exceedingly good at propaganda. But Western Democracies have also developed ways and means to use PR/spin/Propaganda to make the public believe something that may not be strictly-speaking, true. (Telling lies, in other words.)
Which leads us to the Big Question: what requires a big enough lie to be told that warrants $16 million dollars of tax-payers’ money to be spent on Public Relations from Saatchi & Saatchi, plus another $4.2 million in media advertising?
That is difficult to believe when, currently, this government is laying off around 400 military personnel and removing another 600 out of uniform, to re-employ them more cheaply as civilians.
There seems to be an obvious and serious “disconnect” from what the NZDF is telling the public, and where the money is being spent, and what for.
$20 million of tax-payers money is not “small change”. Where is it going, and why?
And why aren’t the media delving more deeply into this issue, instead of two, very brief, superficial newspaper stories?
Perhaps the following provides us with a possible answer…
2. “Media product vetting”
The Sunday Star Times article, by Neil Reid, states that,
“…Locke also provided the Star-Times with a contract TVNZ signed before sending a journalist to join the Provincial Reconstruction Team in Afghanistan, which states the role of defence officials included “media product vetting”.
It follows claims by Hager that the Defence Force had been selective in what it had allowed to be reported in New Zealand on the role of the joint-services team in Afghanistan…”
Commander Phil Bradshaw’s response that the NZDF is vetting images of “LAVs [light armoured vehicles] [and] the Humvees” beggars belief.
Is Cmdr Bradshaw seriously telling us that “media product vetting” (ie; censorship) relates to pictures of light armoured vehicles and humvees?!?! In which case, someone needs to advise Cmdr Bradshaw that there as been a serious security breach: a “Google” search using the parameters “NZ Defence Force lav” yielded 79,400 results for images alone.
Let’s hope Al Qaida has no access to “Google”, or we’re stuffed.
No, folks, there is more to the NZDF’s “media product vetting” (censorship) than pics of a few dusty Army vehicles.
Nicky Hager has pointed the way on this issue, and the media – to it’s eternal shame – has not followed up on this story.
3. Media Complicity?
Not only is there a question mark hanging over how $20 million was spent – but it seems that the mainstream media (MSM) have been decidely blase about asking any serious questions. To date, we’ve seen two newspaper articles by Neil Reid and Andrea Vance – but precious little else in the MSM.
As well as Nicky Hager’s investigative book, “Other People’s Wars“, Jon Stephenson wrote an article for “Metro” magazine on Afghan prisoners’ treatment after being captured by New Zealand’s SAS. This excellent piece of investigative journalism resulted in…
“…Prime Minister John Key’s extraordinary ad hominem attack on independent journalist Jon Stephenson, of ‘Metro’ magazine.
Recently, Stephenson wrote an article in Metro alleging that New Zealand was not meeting its Geneva Convention obligations in its handling of prisoners captured in the course of SAS operations in Afghanistan. You might think that as the only NZ journalist who has regularly been reporting from Afghanistan, Stephenson speaks with some authority.” Source
“Stephenson speaks with some authority”, writes Gordon Campbell.
But not according to the Prime Minister, who dismissed Stephenson’s article with almost sneering derision.
In contrast, two senior journalists, Vernon Small and Guyon Espiner, both stated that they were aware of a CIA “presence” at the Kiwi base in Bamiyan.
“In fact, I, and other reporters before me, were introduced to US intelligence and communications staff at Bamiyan and at other Kiwi forward bases and ate and chatted with them. The stars and stripes flies alongside the New Zealand flag at Bamiyan to advertise the US contingent…” – Vernon Small, Source
Neither felt it necessary to report this fact to the New Zealand public? In fact, both Small and Espiner remained silent until Nicky Hager’s book blew the whistle on the real situation.
For journalists to withhold information that reveals a truth about our government and/or military, shows how far the media has sunk in the last twentyfive years. It raises questions not just about competancy and professionalism, but how far the MSM has become a “cog” in the Establishment.
Perhaps the most obscene thing about this matter is that our beloved Prime Minister, the ever-smiling; happily waving John Key; saw fit to dismiss both Nickey Hager and Jon Stephenson’s investigations into the war in Afghanistan with single, derisory, comments,
“Nothing surprises me when it comes to Nicky Hager. So whether they’re true or not is a completely different issue, but he makes a lot of spurious claims and never generally backs it up.” Source
“I’ve got no reason for NZDF to be lying, and I’ve found [Stephenson] myself personally not to be credible.” Source
Two pieces of investigative journalism; well-researched; impeccably documented; and both able to withstand critical scrutiny – dismissed by the Prime Minister without any serious explanation whatsoever.
Compare the response of the MSM and public to that of a certain stranded penguin and to the proposed “Wellywood” sign in the capital city, and one begins to suspect that, collectively, our priorities are definitely arse-about-face. Perhaps if the SAS had handed “Happy Feet” over to the American CIA, for “extraordinary rendition” to some misbegotten Third World state, for “interrogation”, we might have had an uproar from the good folk of New Zealand?
Well, thankfully “Happy Feet” is safe and sound somewhere in the Southern Ocean.
It’s a shame that the same cannot be said of our media in this country.