Can we do it? Bloody oath we can!
Meanwhile, almost 400 tenants have been kicked out of state houses in the last three years.
Housing Minister Phil Heatley said 241 tenancies were ended in the last year.
Tenancies were ended because people had failed to inform Housing New Zealand about income from employment, business interests, assets, that they lived with a partner of sublet the house.
Since July 2010, 119 tenants were successfully prosecuted for fraud.
Housing New Zealand has also identified $6.6 million from the last 12 months that is owed to the Crown, largely for overpaid rent subsidies.
“The state housing system is designed to help people in their time of need. It’s unfair and unacceptable for people to abuse the system and commit fraud to get benefits they are not entitled to. People who deliberately rip-off the system deprive families in real need,” Heatley said.
The houses were now freed up for those with genuine need, he said.
On most levels, the mis-use of State assets (ie; owned by us, the People) is a rort that cannot and should not be tolerated. Housing Minister, Phil Heatley is correct when he reminds us that,
“The state housing system is designed to help people in their time of need. It’s unfair and unacceptable for people to abuse the system and commit fraud to get benefits they are not entitled to. People who deliberately rip-off the system deprive families in real need.”
Although I note that Mr Heatley’s admonitions did not stop certain Ministers of the Crown from ripping of the tax-payer, when it suited them…
And similar cases where Members of Parliament used their accomodation allowance in ways in was not intended…
Defence Minister Wayne Mapp said his previous apartment had been very small and was not suitable for him and his wife, now he was spending more time in Wellington as a minister.
He confirmed the apartment was owned by his superannuation trust and was rented to National MP Bakshi Singh, for $400 a week.
As an MP Mr Singh can claim up to $24,000 year in accommodation costs from Parliamentary Service.
Dr Mapp also collected around $700 a week for his new larger apartment and said he could see why his rental income should be used to offset his expense claims.
“I can see why people have concerns and the review will deal with that,’ Dr Mapp said.
Housing Minister Phil Heatley also said he was renting out his old apartment and claiming a $1000 a week in accommodation expenses in a larger home to accommodate his wife and young children.
Mr Heatley would not say whether this was rented to an MP. – Source
It seems that rules are different for some folk.
The shortage of state housing is a serious matter, though. This critical problem of decent, affordable housing is not helped by the fact that the Fourth National government (1996-1999) sold around 13,000 State Houses in the 1990s. These properties were supposedly made available to tenants – but actually went mostly to property speculators (who later sold them for tax-free capital gains).
When Labour was elected to power in November 1999, they immediatly placed a moratorium on the sale of state housing. According to HNZ, they currently ” own or manage more than 66,000 properties throughout the country, including about 1,500 homes used by community groups”
This government has re-instated the sale of state houses. It does not take rocket science to work out that selling of state housing reduces the availability of housing stock. Housing Minister Phil Heatley said that,
“… about 40,000 of the 69,000 state house stock will be available for sale,” but then added, “that the vast majority of tenants do not earn enough to be required to pay market rent means relatively few will be in a position to buy“. (Source.)
There seems to be nothing stopping tenants from buying their state house and immediatly on-selling it to a Third Party.
Is it any wonder that the shortage of state housing is not being addressed in any meaningful way? It certainly does help those on the current waiting list (as of 30 June);
- 402 were Priority Eligible — A
- 3,352 were Priority Eligible — B
Plus a further 5,132 in categories “C” and “D”.
Problem: there are currently 8,886 people on the HNZ waiting-list.
Solution: build more houses.
This may seem like a ‘flippant’ answer to a desperate problem – but it is not.
The building of 10,000 new state houses may seem an outrageously expensive idea. But it would address at least three pressing problems in our economy and society;
1. Persistantly high unemployment.
2. Low growth.
3. Inadequate housing for the poorest of our fellow New Zealanders.
At an average housing cost of $257,085 (calculated at DBH website @ $1,773/m for a 145 square metre, small house), the cost (excluding land) is $2.57 billion dollars, including GST (approximate estimate).
By contrast, the October 2010 tax cuts gave $2.5 billion to the top 10% of income earners.
For roughly the cost of last year’s tax cuts, we could have embarked on a crash building-programme to construct ten thousand new dwellings in this country. The immediate effects would have been profound for the building industry and would have created work for;
- drain layers
- concreting contractors
- insulation installers
- home-heating installers
- carpet layers
- etc, etc.
Work would flow through to associated contractors;
- truck drivers
- building waste disposal
Turnover would increase for timber and framing suppliers as well as other building supplies outlets.
In turn, those in the building and associated industries would enjoy massive increase in demand for their products.
And equally important, those on the unemployment queue would suddenly be in high demand, as we needed to train more tradespeople. Which would mean a flow-on effect to polytechnics as they suddenly needed to train hundreds more tradespeople.
A further flow-on effect would impact positively on service industries, as money flowed into the economy, into supermarkets; entertainment; clothing; and elsewhere into the retail sector. As Bill Kaye-Blake of NZIER, said in April of this year;
“The economy is sluggish because people are not spending.“
It would be a boom-time, as two and a half billion dollars was spent on products and services.
Would it actually end up costing taxpayers $2.57 billion dollars? The answer is ‘no’. Government would actually re-coup much of that initial outlay through;
- other taxes
- reduced spending on welfare for unemployed
- and investment re-couped by rent paid for new rentals
Would it work?
The government has a strong role to play in tough economic times. A “hands off” approach will achieve nothing except unnecessarily drawing out an already painful recession, and prompting more frustrated New Zealanders to “cross the Ditch” to Australia, where their government has announced a programme aimed at 500,000 new jobs.
There is no reason why a determined government cannot adopt a bold programme for economic growth.
Instead of borrowing to pay for tax cuts we can ill afford, we should be investing in jobs. The rest will almost invariably take care of itself.
We have the resources. We have the money. We have the demand for new housing. What else is missing?
The will to do it.
= fs =
For a better New Zealand…
~ Cleaner rivers
~ No deep-sea oil drilling
~ Less on Roads - more on Rail
~ A Living wage at $18.40/hr
~ Marriage equality - Yay! Got that one!
~ Strong, effective Unions
~ No secret free-trade deals
~ Breakfast/lunches in our schools
~ Introducing Civics into our school curriculum
~ Cut back on the liquor industry
~ A fairer, progressive tax system
~ Fully funded, free healthcare
~ Ditto for education, including Tertiary
~ Fund Pharmac for Pompe's Disease medication & other 'orphan' drugs
~ No state asset sales!
~ Rebuild public TV broadcasting!
~ Keeping farms in local ownership
~ Reduce poverty, like we reduced the toll for road-fatalities
~ Jobs, Jobs, Jobs!
~ Being nice to each other
- People power trumps vile sexism any day!
- 2014 – Ongoing jobless tally
- Guest Author: A Cry of desperation from Christchurch
- Letter to the Editor – the Royal Visit and endless photo ops for Dear Leader
- National MPs – giving us the finger in election year
- Random Thoughts on Random Things #7 – the fate of the Maori Party
- The Media will respond to Kim Dotcom’s up-coming revelations professionally, impartially, and with all due diligence…
- Guest Author: So John Key, a man can’t be a feminist?
- Dear Leader loves you!
- Party Lists – Election 2014
- To any Israeli solidiers reading this…
- TV3 News on Polling Cellphone Users – Only A Year Late
- Barbarians at the Gates
- The Donghua Liu Affair: responses from NZ Herald and Prime Minister’s Office – Is the PM’s office fudging?
- Protest against National Party soiree results in one arrest – for bugger all!
- The Great Worldwide Treasure Hunt – NZ Herald style…
- The Liu Affair: The first step to a complaint to the Press Council.
- The Donghua Liu Affair – the impending final act and curtain-fall in this smear-campaign
- Another useless law?
- Political Joke of the Week…
- The Donghua Liu Affair threatens to unravel – PM and NZ Herald caught up in a dirty trick campaign?
- Nat’s courts good, Labour’s courts bad?!
- Political cartoon of the Week!
- Why this young chap will be voting National…
- The Donghua Liu Affair – Damn lies, dirty tricks, and a docile media
- ‘Tricky’ media…
- Let’s cast the net and see what rotten fish we catch…
- Labour’s collapse in the polls – why?
- Three suggestions for Labour
- The Boundless Arrogance of the Right
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- 305,761 hits